Mathematical Philosophy: Christian Faith Alignment Explored

The relationship between mathematics and Christian faith is a complex and multifaceted one. While some may view the two as distinct and separate disciplines, others argue for a deeper connection and interplay between the two.

On one hand, mathematics is often seen as a secular pursuit, based on logic and deduction, while Christian faith is rooted in revelation, scripture, and tradition. This dichotomy can be seen in the works of early Christian thinkers such as Tertullian, who famously asked, What has Athens to do with Jerusalem?, suggesting a conflict between faith and reason.

However, throughout history, many Christian theologians and philosophers have drawn on philosophical and mathematical concepts to explore and defend their faith. For example, Augustine of Hippo, one of the most influential Christian thinkers, integrated Platonic philosophy into his theological writings, shaping Christian thinking for centuries.

Moreover, the development of modern science and mathematics in Christian Europe during the 17th and 18th centuries cannot be overlooked. Figures like Copernicus, Kepler, Galileo, and Newton, who revolutionized the mathematical sciences, were deeply religious Christians who saw their scientific work as a religious undertaking.

Today, the dialogue between mathematics and Christian faith continues. Some Christian scholars, such as Ian Paul, argue that mathematics can lead to a sense of wonder and transcendence, revealing a deeper structure and complexity to the world. Others, like Russell Howell, explore the role of faith and axiomatic assumptions in mathematics, challenging the notion that mathematics is purely objective and value-neutral.

In conclusion, while the relationship between mathematics and Christian faith is complex and multifaceted, it is clear that the two have influenced and informed each other throughout history, and continue to do so in contemporary discussions.

The relationship between philosophy and theology in the Christian tradition

Philosophy and theology have often been connected, with theologians and philosophers interacting and debating similar and sometimes overlapping issues. Philosophy played a key role in the formation of Western theology, with many theologians borrowing concepts from philosophers.

In the early years of Christianity, Patristic thinkers did not understand themselves as "theologians" in contrast to "philosophers". Instead, they reasoned about their Christian commitments in the intellectual idiom of the ancient Mediterranean world, which was the idiom of Platonic, Aristotelian, and Stoic philosophy.

Over the course of the Patristic period, the early Church successfully established its own intellectual framework and formally defined the boundaries of Christian orthodoxy through a series of ecumenical councils. However, even after the parameters of orthodoxy were established, Christian thinkers continued to face difficult philosophical questions about the meaning, coherence, and plausibility of settled Christian doctrines.

Christian thinkers have always drawn on philosophy to help answer these kinds of questions. They continued to try to answer those questions using the best philosophy of their day—from Scholastic Aristotelianism in the Medieval period to analytic metaphysics today.

In modern times, some theologians have turned to continental philosophy, analytic philosophy, and postmodern philosophy in attempts to analyze and reframe Christian theology in contemporary contexts.

Many contemporary philosophers continue to write and argue from a Christian perspective, with Christian concepts undergirding their philosophical work.

The Relationship Between Mathematics and the Christian Faith

Christianity and mathematics have a long and complex history. Some mathematicians and scientists, like Galileo, saw mathematics as a religious undertaking and believed that studying the mathematical sciences was a way to connect with God.

Mathematics and the Christian faith also intersect in their shared focus on truth. Mathematics concerns itself with propositions known or accepted as true, and Christians are committed to what is true.

Additionally, mathematics can lead to a sense of wonder at the world, as it reveals the structure and complexity of the world of abstract ideas. This sense of wonder can also be applied to theology, as Christians seek to understand God and explore the unseen reality that underlies the seen world.

Mathematics can also be a fantastic discipline for training one's thinking and developing skills in following logical arguments, which can be a wonderful asset in thinking carefully about faith and scripture.

The integration model treats philosophy and Christian theology as continuous, integrated activities

This account of the relationship between philosophy and theology has deep roots in the Christian tradition. Before the rise of the medieval university, it was the dominant view, and it still has contemporary defenders. Patristic thinkers did not typically describe their own intellectual work as "theology". The term "theology" already had a fixed meaning in late antiquity. It meant "poetic speech about the gods", and was in general associated with pagan story-telling and myth-making: the great "theologians", were Homer and Hesiod. Even though Christian thinkers like Gregory of Nazianzus sometimes acquired the honorific title "Theologian", they did so because of the lyrical and poetic quality of their writing, not because they wrote about Christian doctrinal topics.

The general term that early Christian thinkers used to describe their intellectual work was, more often than not, simply "philosophy" or "Christian philosophy". Christianity was regarded as the "true philosophy" over against the false philosophical schools associated with pagan thought.

The Integration account continued to be the default account of the relationship between philosophy and theology into the early Medieval period. Before the rise of scholasticism in the great Western universities, there was no sharp distinction between philosophy and theology. Anselm of Canterbury, for example, certainly has the concept of a line of inquiry that proceeds using reason alone, without appealing to revelation, but he does not label that inquiry "philosophy" in distinction from "theology". Moreover, in his own writings, he frequently blurs any such distinction, as he seamlessly moves between rational reflection and argument, on the one hand, to prayers, meditations, and exclamations of thanksgiving, on the other. Like many premodern Christian thinkers, Anselm also held that intellectual inquiry and personal holiness are linked, so that the more one grows in Christian virtue, the more rationally one is able to think about God. This understanding of inquiry and virtue is also a hallmark of the Integration account.

The cooperation model treats philosophy and theology as different, yet mutually supporting, intellectual activities

Thomas Aquinas is a foundational advocate of the cooperation model. He often used the metaphor that philosophy is the servant of theology (ancilla theologiae, literally "handmaid" of theology). In a more contemporary idiom, theology uses conceptual tools provided by philosophy in the pursuit of its own distinctive intellectual task: elucidating the meaning and truth of revealed Christian doctrines.

According to Aquinas, theologians use the conceptual tools furnished by philosophy to elucidate the contents of revelation. Just like philosophers, theologians make arguments, and their arguments appeal to common standards of logic and rigor, even though they also draw on theology's own unique (revealed) axioms and sources of evidence.

Philosophy and theology are understood to be different, but mutually supporting, intellectual activities. They form a coherent, mutually supportive whole. They are not in conflict with respect to their conclusions, since truth cannot contradict truth, but they differ with respect to their foundational axioms, goals, and sources of evidence.

The disjunction model regards philosophy and theology as non-overlapping forms of inquiry, which feature distinct and ultimately unrelated goals and methods

Philosophy and theology are understood to be different, but mutually supporting, intellectual activities. Philosophy considers its objects of inquiry from the perspective of common human reason and sense experience, with the goal of trying to understand things as they actually are in the real world. Theology considers its objects of inquiry from a creational and eschatological perspective, with the goal of trying to understand them in relation to God as their creator and final end.

Philosophy takes its foundational axioms and assumptions from generally available truths of human reason and sensory experience. Theology, on the other hand, assumes the truth of divine revelation, and can appeal to scripture and authoritative Church tradition as sources of evidence.

Philosophy and theology also differ in the way they argue and in the kinds of intellectual appeals that are proper to each. Theologians can appeal to revelation and treat revealed truths as evidence in their investigations. Philosophers, on the other hand, must appeal only to premises and evidence that are in principle available to any rational enquirer.

The conflict model treats philosophy and theology as essentially incompatible

The conflict model is based on the assumption that there is an intrinsic intellectual conflict between religion and science, which inevitably leads to hostility. This assumption is rejected by the consensus among historians of science, who argue that the conflict model has long been discredited. Instead, they widely accept a complexity model, acknowledging that religious figures have taken positions on both sides of each dispute and that there was no overall aim by any party involved in discrediting religion.

The conflict model is also not prevalent among scientists and the general public. Studies show that most scientists and people do not subscribe to the conflict perspective and instead believe that the relation is one of independence or collaboration between science and religion.

Christianity and the mathematical sciences have had a complex relationship throughout history. While some mathematicians and scientists have been religious, others have not. For example, four men who perhaps did as much as any to revolutionize the mathematical sciences in the 16th and 17th Centuries, Copernicus, Kepler, Galileo, and Newton, were all deeply religious Christians who saw their scientific work as a religious undertaking. On the other hand, the Catholic Church put Galileo on trial in 1633 for his support of heliocentrism, which was considered heretical at the time.

Frequently asked questions