Understanding Good Faith Imposed: Obligations And Their Meanings

The obligation of good faith is a legal principle that dictates that parties to a contract must deal with each other honestly, fairly, and in good faith. This means acting with a legal purpose and upholding expectations of fairness, transparency, and reasonableness. While there is no general duty of good faith in English contract law, it is implied in certain contract types, such as insurance, employment, and partnership contracts, as well as long-term 'relational' commercial contracts. In the context of employment, the duty of good faith is commonly referred to as the implied duty of trust and confidence, which applies to both employers and employees. A breach of this duty can lead to legal consequences, including compensation or other relief for the affected party.

Good faith in contract law

In contract law, the obligation of good faith imposed means that parties to a contract are presumed to deal with each other honestly, fairly, and in good faith. This presumption is known as the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. It is important to note that this covenant is implied in a number of contract types, including insurance, employment, and partnership contracts, as well as in 'relational' commercial contracts, such as joint venture agreements. The purpose of this covenant is to reinforce the express covenants or promises made in the contract and to ensure that neither party does anything to destroy or injure the right of the other party to receive the benefits of the contract.

The implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing is a rule used by most courts in the United States. This rule requires all parties in a contract to implement the agreement as intended and not to use means to undercut the purpose of the transaction. It is important to note that this rule applies to the performance of a contract, not the negotiation of it, and it is generally applied to any contract automatically, even if it is not explicitly stated in the agreement. However, the specific definition of good faith and fair dealing can vary depending on the context of the agreement, as courts have discretion in determining its scope.

A breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing can occur when one party attempts to claim the benefit of a technical excuse for breaching the contract or when they use specific contractual terms in isolation to refuse to fulfil their contractual obligations, despite the general circumstances and understandings between the parties. In such cases, a lawsuit or cause of action may arise. While most U.S. jurisdictions view a breach of this covenant as a variant of breach of contract, resulting in ordinary contractual damages, some jurisdictions also allow for tort actions, particularly in insurance law.

In Canadian contract law, there are two distinct duties related to good faith: the duty to negotiate in good faith and the duty to act honestly in the performance of contractual obligations. The duty to negotiate in good faith arises when there is an imbalance in bargaining power between the parties, such as in negotiations between franchisors and franchisees or insurers and insured parties. On the other hand, the duty of honest contractual performance, also known as the doctrine of abuse of rights, prohibits parties from lying or knowingly misleading each other about matters directly linked to the performance of the contract.

Good faith in employment contracts

The obligation of good faith imposed in employment contracts means that both the employer and employee agree to the terms of the contract in good faith and plan to deal fairly with one another in performing and enforcing the contract.

In contract law, the covenant of good faith and fair dealing is a general presumption that the parties to a contract will deal with each other honestly, fairly, and in good faith, so as to not destroy the right of the other party or parties to receive the benefits of the contract. This is implied in a number of contract types, including insurance, employment and partnership contracts, as well as so-called 'relational' commercial contracts, to reinforce the express covenants or promises of the contract.

In the context of employment contracts, good faith would cause both parties to act respectfully to one another. Each party must act honestly and faithfully with respect to the contract. If a party acts dishonestly or knowingly deviates from the terms of the contract, a court would likely consider this bad faith and a breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing.

A party that acts in bad faith may be legally liable to the party who has acted in good faith. To prevail on a legal claim for a breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, a plaintiff must be able to show that a contract actually existed and that the other party acted in bad faith to deprive them of some benefit defined in the contract. For instance, if an employee is entitled to pay for work already performed, but the employer, without just cause, refuses to pay, then the employer is likely acting in bad faith.

It is important to note that a finding of bad faith cannot be based on an accidental or honest mistake. Rather, bad faith requires a finding that one party intended to act unfairly or deceive the other.

Good faith in negotiations

In the context of contract law, the obligation of good faith implies that parties to a contract will deal with each other honestly, fairly, and in good faith. This means that they will not undermine the other party's right to receive the benefits of the contract. The duty of good faith is particularly relevant in certain types of contracts, such as insurance, employment, and partnership contracts, as well as in long-term 'relational' commercial contracts like joint ventures.

In Canadian contract law, there is a distinct duty to negotiate in good faith. This duty is recognised in Québecois contract law and in certain circumstances in the common law jurisdictions. For instance, in Québec, this duty is grounded in Section 1375 of the Civil Code, which states that parties to a contract must act in good faith not only when performing an obligation but also "at the time the obligation arises". While English common law traditionally did not recognise this duty, Canadian contract law does so when there is an imbalance in bargaining power between the parties. Circumstances that give rise to this duty include negotiations between franchisors and franchisees, insurers and insured parties, contracts related to marriages and separation agreements, invitations to tender, and fiduciary relationships.

In the United States, the legal concept of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing emerged in the mid-19th century to address situations where a strict interpretation of contract language granted one party unbridled discretion. This covenant is now incorporated into the Uniform Commercial Code and recognised in most U.S. jurisdictions. However, the breach of this covenant is generally treated as a variant of breach of contract, giving rise to ordinary contractual damages.

Good faith in commercial contracts

Express Obligations to Act in Good Faith

Parties may negotiate and agree on express terms requiring them to act in good faith when performing the agreement or fulfilling specific obligations. However, careful drafting is required to ensure that the courts will uphold these intentions. English law provides some flexibility in the language used to create a duty of good faith, but this flexibility is limited. For example, an agreement to "have regard" to certain principles of openness, honesty, clarity, and reliability does not create a duty of good faith. Express duties of good faith are often interpreted narrowly by English courts, applying only to specific provisions rather than the entire agreement.

Implied Duty of Good Faith in Relational Contracts

The most significant development in English law regarding good faith is the recognition of implied duties in "relational" contracts. A contract is considered relational if it meets certain criteria, including being a long-term contract, having a high degree of collaboration between the parties, and involving significant investment by one or both parties. Examples include joint venture agreements, franchise agreements, and long-term distributorship agreements. In these cases, the parties are subject to duties of good faith as a matter of law and are prohibited from conduct that would be regarded as commercially unacceptable by reasonable and honest people.

Exercising Contractual Discretions in Good Faith

When one party has the power to make a decision that affects the rights of both parties, English courts have implied a term that this power should not be exercised in an arbitrary, capricious, or irrational manner. This is known as the "Braganza" duty of rationality. A duty of good faith may be implied when there is a range of options to choose from, but not when exercising absolute contractual rights.

Breach of the Duty of Good Faith

A breach of the duty of good faith may occur when a party acts in bad faith or engages in conduct that falls short of dishonesty but is still considered commercially unacceptable. This could include acting in a manner that destroys or injures the right of the other party to receive the benefits of the contract.

In conclusion, while English law does not recognise a general doctrine of good faith in commercial contracts, express and implied duties of good faith can arise in specific circumstances. Careful drafting of contractual terms is essential to ensure that the intentions of the parties are upheld in court.

Good faith in insurance contracts

The doctrine of utmost good faith imposes specific obligations on both the insurance agent and the applicant. Insurance agents are required to disclose critical details about the contract and its terms, ensuring that applicants have all the necessary information to make informed decisions. On the other hand, applicants must provide honest and complete answers to all questions asked by the insurer. This includes disclosing precise details about the item or risk being insured, as well as any previous refusals of insurance coverage.

The significance of good faith in insurance contracts was established in the landmark case of Carter v Boehm (1766/1776). In this case, Lord Mansfield emphasised that if any relevant facts are concealed, whether intentionally or not, the risk assumed by the insurer may differ from their intended risk, rendering the policy void. This principle was later affirmed in Section 17 of the Marine Insurance Act 1906, which states that a marine insurance contract is based on utmost good faith and that a breach of this good faith by either party may result in the contract being voided.

The duty of good faith in insurance contracts manifests in two key ways. Firstly, there is a positive duty on both parties to disclose material information. Secondly, there is an obligation not to make any material misrepresentations. While these duties apply to both the insurer and the insured, they tend to be more onerous for the insured due to their sole knowledge of key information required for risk assessment.

The repercussions for violating the doctrine of good faith in insurance contracts can vary. In some cases, providing inaccurate information, intentional misinformation, or fraudulent concealment may result in the contract being voided. Additionally, the misinformed party may have the right to take legal action and recoup costs associated with the fulfilment of the contract.

Frequently asked questions