Mediation's Core Principle: Good Faith Explained

Mediation is an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) process that is quicker, more procedurally flexible, and more cost-efficient than litigation. It is also a more suitable way of handling separations and divorces, as the parties involved are in the best position to reach a resolution, knowing all the intimate facts of their separation. However, for mediation to be successful, both parties must enter the process in good faith, meaning they have a sincere intention to resolve their dispute. This paragraph will explore the concept of good faith in mediation and provide an overview of the benefits and challenges of this approach to dispute resolution.

The definition of 'good faith'

The concept of "good faith" is a highly subjective and context-dependent idea, but it is a crucial aspect of mediation. While the specific definition may vary depending on the context and jurisdiction, it generally refers to acting with sincerity, honesty, and a genuine intention to resolve a dispute.

In the context of mediation, "good faith" implies that both parties approach the process with a sincere desire to find a mutually agreeable solution. This means being open to compromise, actively engaging in negotiations, and considering the other party's perspective. It is important to note that mediating in good faith does not mean that an agreement must be reached; rather, it signifies a commitment to the process and a willingness to explore all possibilities.

Black's Law Dictionary defines "good faith" as:

• Honesty in belief or purpose;
• Faithfulness to one's duty or obligation;
• Observance of reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing in a given trade or business;
• Absence of intent to defraud or seek an unconscionable advantage.

These definitions provide a framework for understanding the key elements of good faith, which include transparency, fairness, and a commitment to ethical behaviour.

In the legal context, courts may interpret "good faith" narrowly, requiring parties to provide a mediation statement, attend the mediation, and have an authorised representative present. However, the subjective nature of "good faith" makes it challenging to define and enforce uniformly. Ultimately, the mediator may be the one to decide whether mediation was conducted in good faith, and their compliance report can significantly influence the court's perception.

While the definition of "good faith" may vary, it is essential in mediation to promote a constructive atmosphere and increase the chances of a successful resolution.

Examples of acting in 'good faith'

Acting in good faith is a broad term that covers honest dealing. Depending on the context, it may require an honest belief or purpose, faithful performance of duties, observance of fair dealing standards, or no intention to defraud or seek an unconscionable advantage.

In the context of mediation, good faith can be demonstrated in several ways, such as:

• Communicating with the mediator and the other party within a reasonable amount of time.
• Completing financial disclosure.
• Being transparent during negotiations.
• Demonstrating a willingness to take proposals seriously and making reasonable counter-proposals.
• Making good on their offers.
• Complying with previous settlements reached in mediation.

In the legal context, the covenant of good faith and fair dealing is implied in every written agreement. This means that all parties to a contract will deal with each other honestly, fairly, and in good faith, so as not to destroy the right of the other party to receive the benefits of the contract.

• In Business Dealings: The Uniform Commercial Code, which has been adopted in every US state, gives merchants the right to retain goods purchased from a seller who lacked the right to sell them. However, the merchant must prove that they were unaware of the seller's or goods' state and thus acted in good faith when acquiring them.
• In Employment Law: The National Labor Relations Act of 1935 gave private-sector workers the right to form or join a union and engage in collective bargaining with their employers. It also mandated that employers negotiate with unions in good faith.
• In Contract Law: In the US, the covenant of good faith and fair dealing is implied in every written agreement. This means that all parties to a contract will deal with each other honestly, fairly, and in good faith, so as not to destroy the right of the other party to receive the benefits of the contract.
• In Insurance Law: In certain jurisdictions, an insurer's breach of the implied covenant of good faith can give rise to a tort action known as insurance bad faith, allowing for broader compensatory and punitive damages.
• In Family Law: In divorce and custody cases, courts often require mediation to be attempted before a final hearing. While mediation does not require reaching an agreement, it is expected that both parties will negotiate in good faith, which means having a sincere intention to try to find a resolution to the dispute.

Examples of acting in 'bad faith'

To mediate in good faith means that both parties have a sincere intention of trying to find a resolution to a dispute. This can be demonstrated in several ways, such as being transparent during negotiations, making reasonable counter-proposals, and complying with previous settlements.

Acting in bad faith, on the other hand, is an act of intentional dishonesty. Here are some examples:

Failing to Provide Information

If one party fails to provide any information to the other party before or during mediation, this could be considered acting in bad faith. For instance, not updating financial disclosures or providing incomplete information can hinder the mediation process and indicate a lack of sincerity in reaching a resolution.

Leaving Mid-Mediation

If a party leaves the mediation session prematurely, contrary to the wishes or advice of the mediator, it could be seen as a bad faith move. This demonstrates a lack of commitment to the process and an unwillingness to engage in good-faith negotiations.

Inappropriate Behaviour or Language

Using inappropriate language or engaging in demeaning behaviour towards the other party during mediation can be considered acting in bad faith. Mediation should be a respectful and constructive process, and cursing, yelling, or other disrespectful actions can hinder the chances of reaching a resolution.

Misleading or Deceiving the Other Party

Deliberately misleading or deceiving the other party during negotiations is a clear example of acting in bad faith. This includes making false statements, misrepresenting facts, or providing misleading information to gain an advantage or benefit.

Failing to Honour Commitments

When parties enter into an agreement, they are expected to honour their commitments and obligations. Failing to fulfil promises or meet agreed-upon standards can be considered acting in bad faith, as it indicates a lack of sincerity and commitment to the mediation process.

Insurance Bad Faith

Insurance bad faith refers to dishonest practices by insurance companies, such as denying claims without valid reasons, failing to conduct prompt investigations, or delaying payments. These actions can cause significant harm to policyholders and indicate a breach of the duty to act in good faith.

The importance of good faith in mediation

Good faith is a term that is often used in mediation, but what does it mean, and why is it important? This concept is essential to the mediation process and can make the difference between a successful resolution and a failed negotiation.

Good faith is a state of mind or an intention to act in a certain way. Black's Law Dictionary defines good faith as:

> "A state of mind consisting in (1) honesty in belief or purpose; (2) faithfulness to one's duty or obligation; (3) observance of reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing in a given trade or business, or (4) absence of intent to defraud or to seek unconscionable advantage."

In the context of mediation, good faith means that both parties have a sincere intention to try and find a resolution to their dispute. It is important to note that good faith does not mean that an agreement must be reached; instead, it is about approaching the process with a positive and constructive attitude.

Mediation is an alternative dispute resolution process that is quicker, more flexible, and often more cost-effective than traditional litigation. It allows the parties involved to have more control over the outcome and can help to preserve relationships, which is especially important in cases such as divorce and custody battles. However, for mediation to be successful, both parties must be willing to negotiate in good faith.

When parties enter mediation in good faith, they are more likely to reach a resolution that is satisfactory to both sides. This is because good faith encourages open and honest communication, transparency, and a willingness to consider and make reasonable proposals. It also demonstrates respect for the mediator and the process, which can help to create a more positive and productive atmosphere.

On the other hand, when parties mediate in bad faith, it can lead to frustration, resentment, and a breakdown in communication. Bad faith behaviours can include failing to provide necessary information, leaving mid-mediation, engaging in inappropriate behaviour or language, or refusing to engage in the process constructively. Not only does this make it difficult to reach a resolution, but it can also result in legal consequences, such as sanctions, and may ultimately lead to litigation, which defeats the purpose of mediation.

Good faith is a critical component of successful mediation. It requires parties to approach the process with sincerity, honesty, and a willingness to engage in fair and reasonable negotiations. While it may be challenging to define and measure good faith objectively, it is essential to recognise its importance and strive to uphold this standard. By mediating in good faith, parties can increase the likelihood of a positive outcome and avoid the time, expense, and acrimony associated with traditional litigation.

The challenges of defining 'good faith'

The challenges of defining good faith

Good faith is a highly subjective concept, and its definition will vary depending on who you ask. While Black's Law Dictionary provides a definition of "good faith", the interpretation of this definition in practice is far from clear. This subjectivity presents a challenge when determining whether parties are acting in good faith during mediation.

One of the key challenges in defining good faith is that it can mean different things in different contexts. For example, in the English legal system, good faith has had a strained relationship with negotiations. Lord Ackner commented that "a duty to negotiate in good faith is as unworkable in practice as it is inherently inconsistent with the position of a negotiating party". This highlights the challenge of reconciling a duty of good faith with the competitive nature of negotiation.

Another challenge in defining good faith is that it can be difficult to determine what it requires of a party in a given situation. There is inherent uncertainty about when a party's behaviour might breach an obligation of good faith, and assessing any recoverable loss if a breach is proven can be complex. This may explain why cases implying an obligation of good faith, absent established situations, are relatively rare.

Additionally, the concept of good faith can be difficult to enforce. While courts can sanction litigants for failing to comply with pretrial orders, including mediation orders, defining bad faith can be vague and difficult to enforce consistently. This subjectivity can make it challenging to hold parties accountable for acting in bad faith.

Furthermore, the evaluation of good faith can vary depending on cultural and societal norms. What might be considered good faith in one cultural context could be perceived differently in another. This adds another layer of complexity to defining and evaluating good faith in mediation.

Lastly, the interpretation of good faith can be influenced by the power dynamics between the parties involved. A party with more power or authority may have a different understanding of good faith compared to a less powerful party, which can create challenges in reaching a mutual agreement.

In conclusion, while good faith is an important concept in mediation, it is challenging to define and evaluate due to its subjective nature, varying interpretations, and the complexities of enforcing it. Ultimately, the success of mediation depends on the willingness of the parties to engage in genuine efforts to resolve matters, despite the inherent challenges of defining good faith.

Frequently asked questions