Justification By Faith: Understanding James' Perspective

James 2:24 is often interpreted as a contradiction of the doctrine of justification by faith alone. However, theologians argue that James is not refuting this doctrine but addressing a different question and speaking of a different kind of justification. While Paul speaks of justification before God, which is by faith alone, James is concerned with justification before others, which requires the manifestation of faith through works. James argues that faith without works is dead and useless, emphasizing the need for a living faith that produces good works. He uses the examples of Abraham and Rahab to illustrate that genuine faith is demonstrated through actions. This interpretation aligns with Paul's teaching that faith works through love, showing that both apostles teach complementary truths.

James 2:24 is not in contradiction with Paul's teachings on justification by faith alone

James 2:24, which reads, "You see that a person is justified by works and not by faith alone", is often used as evidence that James and Paul contradict each other on the matter of justification by faith. However, this is not the case. Paul and James are addressing two different questions and are speaking of two different kinds of faith and two different kinds of justification.

Paul is describing what we would call conversion—the moment when a person is justified by faith alone. James, on the other hand, is not looking at saving faith but the fruit of it. Paul is looking at the root, and James is looking at the fruit. The two are inseparably bound and are two sides of the same coin.

Paul was aware that his teaching of justification by faith alone was being distorted and misused by those who said, "Well, if we are justified while we are ungodly by faith alone, and this magnifies the grace of God, then let's just keep sinning, because we are secure anyway and God's grace will get more glory." James, meanwhile, wrote to those who were disposed to think that intellectual assent could save them. Paul counteracts legalism, while James corrects antinomianism.

Paul and James teach complementary, not contradictory, truths. Both would agree that a person is justified by faith alone, but that true faith is never alone. It bears the fruit of love. It must do so or it is dead, demon, useless faith and does not justify.

James is addressing those who think intellectual assent can save them

James is concerned with a kind of "counterfeit faith" that does not produce love. He gives the example of someone who claims to have faith but does not help a brother or sister in need, saying that such faith is useless and cannot save. He describes this kind of faith as dead, devilish, and useless.

James is not contradicting Paul's teaching of justification by faith alone but rather correcting a misuse of it. Paul was aware that his teaching was being distorted and misused by those who said that if we are justified by faith alone, we can continue to sin because we are secure anyway. James is addressing those who are disposed to think that intellectual assent can save them, while Paul wrote to churches where people were tempted to trust in their works for salvation.

James and Paul are in agreement that faith alone justifies, but only the kind of faith that inevitably produces good works. True faith will always be accompanied by works, and it is these works that demonstrate our faith is genuine.

James is refuting an abuse of Paul's teaching

The interpretation of James 2:24, which states that "a person is justified by works and not by faith alone", has been a source of debate among theologians, with some arguing that it contradicts Paul's teaching of justification by faith alone. However, a closer examination of the context and the meanings of the words used by James reveals that he is not refuting Paul's doctrine but rather addressing a specific abuse of it.

Firstly, it is important to understand the difference in the usage of the term "justification" by Paul and James. For Paul, "justification" refers to being declared righteous by God, while for James, it carries the sense of proof or evidence for human beings. James is not claiming that works are required for salvation; instead, he emphasises that true faith will inevitably lead to good works. In other words, James is arguing against the notion of a "faith" that is devoid of any actions and is merely an intellectual belief. He provides examples of Abraham and Rahab, who were "justified by works" not by faith alone, demonstrating that their faith was genuine and active.

James' concern is with a kind of "counterfeit faith" that does not produce love. He describes this faith as dead, devilish, and useless, contrasting it with a living and saving faith that works through love. James' teaching aligns with Paul's correction of those who distorted his doctrine of justification by faith alone, using it as an excuse to continue sinning. Paul emphasises that good works and love are the necessary fruit of real, justifying faith.

Both Paul and James address different questions and speak of different kinds of faith and justification. They complement each other rather than contradict. Paul counteracts legalism, emphasising that works are excluded as the basis of salvation, while James corrects antinomianism, stressing that true faith will inevitably lead to good works.

In conclusion, James is not refuting Paul's teaching of justification by faith alone but is addressing a specific abuse of it. He emphasises that true faith will be evident through good works and corrects the notion of a passive and inactive faith.

James is not saying that works are required for salvation

James is clear that faith without works is "dead", "useless", and "inactive". He uses the example of Abraham, who was “justified by works” when he offered up his son Isaac on the altar (James 2:21). This event demonstrated that Abraham's faith was genuine and active, completing or fulfilling the faith that he had already been credited with in Genesis 15:6 (James 2:22-23). James also points to Rahab the prostitute, who was "justified by works" when she received and protected the spies (James 2:25). In both cases, James is showing that true, saving faith will inevitably produce good works. It is not enough to merely profess faith; that faith must be demonstrated through actions.

James is not contradicting Paul's teaching on justification by faith alone. Rather, he is addressing a different issue: antinomianism, or the belief that intellectual assent is enough for salvation. Paul, on the other hand, wrote to churches where people were tempted to trust in their works for salvation, and thus he countered legalism. Both Paul and James are in agreement that works are not the basis of our justification. Instead, they are the result and fruit of true, saving faith. As Paul writes in Galatians 5:6, "faith working through love". This is the same idea that James is conveying: that genuine faith will necessarily result in good works.

In conclusion, James is not saying that works are required for salvation. Rather, he is emphasising that true faith will always be accompanied by works as evidence of its genuineness. Faith without works is dead and useless, and it is only living, active faith that can save.

James is referring to justification in the sense of proof for human beings

James is concerned with a kind of counterfeit faith that does not produce love. He asks: "What use is it, my brethren, if someone says he has faith but he has no works? Can that faith save him?" (James 2:14). James is not saying that works are required for salvation. Rather, he is arguing that a so-called "faith" which results in no actions is not a genuine faith. It is a "dead", "useless", or "demon" faith that cannot justify anyone (James 2:17, 20, 26).

James uses the example of Abraham to illustrate his point. Abraham's faith was tested when God commanded him to offer his son Isaac as a sacrifice (Genesis 22). This was not the initial act of justification that put Abraham in a right standing with God. Instead, it was a test to demonstrate that Abraham's faith was living and genuine, producing the "obedience of faith" (James 2:21-23).

Therefore, when James says that Abraham was "justified by works" (James 2:21), he means that works are necessary to confirm and prove the reality of faith. Justification, in this context, refers to maintaining a right standing with God by providing evidence of genuine faith through works of love. James is not saying that works are the basis of our salvation or that they contribute to our justification before God. Rather, he is emphasising that true faith will inevitably produce good works.

In summary, James is referring to justification in the sense of proof or evidence of genuine faith for human beings. He is not contradicting Paul's doctrine of justification by faith alone but is addressing a different aspect of faith and its manifestation in our lives.

Frequently asked questions