Understanding "Good Faith" Endeavors: Meaning And Legal Implications

Endeavours and good faith are terms that often appear in contracts and agreements. Endeavours refers to the commitment to attempt to fulfil an obligation, with varying levels of effort required depending on the specific wording of the clause. Good faith implies fair and honest dealings, including faithfulness to agreed common objectives and acting in the 'spirit' of the agreement. These terms are not absolute and are interpreted based on the context of the contract and the parties' intentions. The recent Brooke Homes case provides insight into how courts interpret these clauses and their implications in commercial agreements.

The three types of 'endeavours' clauses

The Three Types of Endeavours Clauses

Agreements often include endeavours clauses to outline the scope of a party's obligations. While most contractual obligations are expressed as absolute, an endeavour clause is an agreement to attempt to fulfil an obligation. The three types of endeavours clauses commonly used are 'best', 'all reasonable', and 'reasonable', each indicating a different level of obligation.

Best Endeavours

An agreement to use best endeavours is the most onerous type of clause. It requires a party to take all steps within their power to produce the desired results. This may include sacrificing commercial interests, incurring expenditures, or conducting litigation. However, it does not require actions that would lead to the ruin of the company or the utter disregard of shareholder interests.

All Reasonable Endeavours

'All reasonable endeavours' falls between 'best' and 'reasonable' endeavours. It likely requires taking all reasonable courses of action until no more are available but acknowledges that some actions may be beyond a party's control. It may involve some sacrifice of commercial interests and a higher level of expenditure. The interpretation of this clause is not always clear, and it has been argued that it is interchangeable with 'best endeavours' due to the element of reasonableness applied to the latter.

Reasonable Endeavours

Reasonable endeavours are the least onerous type of clause. There is no obligation to sacrifice commercial interests, and the likelihood of achieving the desired result is relevant. If multiple courses of action are available, taking one reasonable step may be sufficient to satisfy the obligation. However, if the contract specifies the steps to be taken, all of those steps must be followed to fulfil the obligation.

The meaning of 'good faith' in the Brooke Homes case

In the Brooke Homes case, the meaning of acting in "good faith" was explored in the context of a contractual dispute between Brooke Homes (Bicester) Ltd (BHB) and Portfolio Property Partners Ltd (the P3 Group). The case centred on the development of a new "eco-town" in Oxfordshire, England, specifically regarding the purchase of land for this development.

In 2015, BHB and the P3 Group entered into a binding agreement, referred to as the "Heads of Agreement." This agreement required both parties to use "all reasonable endeavours" and act in "good faith" towards each other to finalise a conditional contract for the sale and development of part of the land. The agreement included a mutual benefits clause, which allowed for structuring the transaction to achieve the desired commercial and financial outcomes for both parties.

By the end of 2017, negotiations had taken over two years, and the parties had not concluded the conditional sale agreement (CSA). BHB initiated legal proceedings against the P3 Group, alleging a breach of their contractual obligations. The court ruled in favour of BHB, finding the P3 Group liable for breach of contract and awarding BHB £13.4 million in damages.

In the context of this case, the judge defined the duty of acting in "good faith" as requiring the following four elements:

• A duty to act honestly, as judged by reasonable and honest people: This means that both parties are expected to be truthful and transparent in their dealings with each other.
• The observance of reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing: Both parties are expected to uphold fair and ethical commercial practices, ensuring that their actions are consistent with reasonable industry standards.
• Fidelity or faithfulness to the common or contractual purpose: Each party should remain committed to the shared goal of the agreement, in this case, the successful development of the "eco-town."
• Acting consistently with the justified expectations of the parties: This means that both BHB and the P3 Group should fulfil their obligations in a way that aligns with the reasonable expectations set out in the agreement.

In summary, acting in "good faith" in the Brooke Homes case entailed honesty, fairness, faithfulness to the purpose of the contract, and meeting the reasonable expectations of both parties. This interpretation of "good faith" by the court set a precedent for similar contractual disputes and emphasised the importance of upholding ethical standards in commercial agreements.

The duty to act in 'good faith'

The Duty to Act in Good Faith

English contract law does not include a general doctrine of good faith. However, courts will uphold express obligations for parties to act in good faith, and they may imply a duty of good faith if, without it, a contract would lack commercial or practical sense.

A duty to act in good faith generally requires four things:

• A duty to act honestly, judged by reference to reasonable and honest people
• The observance of reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing
• Fidelity or faithfulness to the common purpose, or contractual purpose
• Acting consistently with the justified expectations of the parties

Good faith is often associated with "endeavours" clauses, which commit a party to attempting to fulfil an obligation. There are three types of endeavours clause: "best", "all reasonable", and "reasonable". The type used is subject to negotiation between the parties.

In the 2021 case of Brooke Homes (Bicester) Ltd v Portfolio Property Partners Ltd, the High Court found that the defendant was in breach of contract by failing to act in good faith and use all reasonable endeavours. The judge summarised that a duty of good faith requires the four things listed above.

The consequences of failing to act in accordance with 'endeavours' clauses

The consequences of failing to act in accordance with endeavours clauses

The consequences of failing to act in accordance with endeavours clauses can be serious and result in legal action and financial penalties. For example, in the Brooke Homes case, the court found that Portfolio Property Partners Ltd had breached its agreement with Brooke Homes by failing to use all reasonable endeavours and acting in bad faith. The court awarded Brooke Homes £13.4 million in damages. This case illustrates the potential financial consequences of failing to comply with endeavours clauses.

The specific consequences of failing to act in accordance with endeavours clauses will depend on the jurisdiction and the terms of the contract. In some cases, a breach of an endeavours clause may result in a breach of contract claim, which can lead to damages or specific performance remedies. It could also result in the termination of the contract or other legal remedies, such as injunctions or declarations.

The level of effort required to comply with an endeavours clause will depend on the specific wording of the clause and the context of the agreement. For example, a "reasonable endeavours" clause may only require a party to take one reasonable course of action, while an "all reasonable endeavours" or "best endeavours" clause may require a party to take all available reasonable courses of action and potentially sacrifice some commercial interests.

Failing to act in accordance with endeavours clauses can also damage business relationships and reputations. It can lead to a loss of trust between the parties and negatively impact future negotiations or collaborations. In some cases, it may even lead to negative publicity or reputational damage for the parties involved.

To avoid these consequences, it is crucial for businesses to carefully consider their obligations under endeavours clauses and seek legal advice when necessary. By understanding their commitments and acting in good faith, businesses can help ensure that they comply with their contractual obligations and maintain positive and durable business relationships.

The interpretation of 'endeavours' and 'good faith' clauses

The Interpretation of Endeavours and Good Faith Clauses

Agreements often include endeavours clauses to define the scope of a party's obligations. There are three types of endeavours clauses: 'best', 'all reasonable', and 'reasonable'. The type used depends on the negotiation between the parties. The Brooke Homes case of 2021 clarified the meaning of these clauses. 'Reasonable endeavours' require one reasonable course of action to be taken to discharge the obligation. 'All reasonable endeavours' require all reasonable paths to be exhausted, with passivity potentially constituting a breach. 'Best endeavours' may require the same, with the addition of sacrificing some commercial interests.

Good faith clauses are also common in commercial agreements. The Brooke Homes case outlines that good faith requires:

• Acting honestly, as judged by reasonable and honest people
• Observing reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing
• Being faithful to the overall purpose of the contract and acting in the 'spirit' of the agreement
• Acting consistently with the justified expectations of the parties

The interpretation of these clauses is context-dependent and assessed on a case-by-case basis. To avoid uncertainty, parties should clearly define the specific actions expected of each party.

Frequently asked questions