The President's Constitutional Duty Explained

The Take Care Clause is a provision in Article II, Section 3 of the US Constitution, which states that the President shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed. While the precise meaning of the clause is unclear, it has been used to justify broad exercises of executive power. The Supreme Court has not yet defined the outer limits of discretion under this clause, and its real-world meaning depends on its interpretation by the courts. The clause is often cited as support for expansive views of presidential power, such as going beyond standing law to defend the nation in emergencies, withholding documents from Congress, or refusing to fully execute statutes.

The Take Care Clause

The precise meaning of the clause has been debated, with courts, the executive branch, and scholars interpreting it to justify broad exercises of presidential power. The clause has been used to defend the nation in emergencies, withhold documents from Congress, and refuse to fully execute statutes on grounds of unconstitutionality or policy reasons. The original intent of the clause, as explored by scholars, suggests that it imposed three main requirements on the President: a duty to act within the scope of their office, a duty to not misuse office funds or take unauthorised profits, and a duty to execute the law diligently, carefully, and impartially.

The Supreme Court and lower courts have ruled on cases involving the duties of executive agencies in applying the laws, but the outer limits of discretion under the Take Care Clause remain undefined. The 1985 case of Heckler v. Chaney is a notable example, where the Supreme Court ruled that the courts had no power to judge an executive agency's decision not to enforce a law if Congress had granted discretion to that agency.

The interpretation of "faithful execution" is crucial, as it implies a measure of choice and discretion. The debate centres around what constitutes faithful execution of a law and to whom or what the President should be faithful when executing the law. This interpretation has significant implications for the balance of power between the President and Congress and the scope of presidential authority.

Presidential power

The "Take Care" Clause, as outlined in Article II, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution, mandates that the President "shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed". This clause has been used to justify broad exercises of presidential power, although its precise meaning remains ambiguous and subject to interpretation.

The "Take Care" Clause potentially implicates five categories of executive power:

• Powers directly conferred upon the President by the Constitution's Article II.
• Powers that congressional acts directly bestow upon the President.
• Powers that congressional acts confer upon heads of departments and other executive agencies of the federal government.
• Power derived from the duty to enforce the criminal statutes of the United States.
• Power to carry out ministerial duties, where an executive officer has limited discretion regarding the occasion or manner of their discharge.

The "Take Care" Clause imposes a duty on the President to ensure the faithful execution of laws, which includes three key requirements:

• Not acting beyond the scope of the presidential office (ultra vires).
• Refraining from misusing office funds or engaging in unauthorized profits.
• Diligent, careful, honest, and impartial execution of the law and the duties of the office.

These duties bear a resemblance to fiduciary duties in modern private law, suggesting that presidential power should be exercised in good faith and for the public interest, rather than for self-serving or bad faith purposes. This interpretation of the "Take Care" Clause could place limitations on certain presidential powers, such as the pardon and removal authority.

Furthermore, the "Take Care" Clause directs the President to respect the work of Congress, indicating that presidential power is subordinate to congressional direction. This clause has been invoked in debates surrounding presidential non-enforcement of statutes and the extent to which Congress can direct the actions of executive officials.

While the "Take Care" Clause grants the President significant authority, it is essential to recognize that the President's power is not absolute and is subject to checks and balances within the U.S. governmental system.

Supreme Court interpretation

The "Take Care Clause", also known as the "Faithful Execution Clause", is a provision in Article II, Section 3 of the US Constitution, which states that the President "shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed".

The Supreme Court has not yet provided a full explanation of what the Clause means, but there have been several important rulings on the duties of executive agencies as they apply the laws under their assigned duties. One of the most important rulings was in the 1985 case of Heckler v. Chaney, where the Supreme Court ruled that the courts had no power to judge the FDA's decision not to enforce federal drug laws, as the question of enforcement had been committed by Congress to the agency's discretion. This ruling stands as an endorsement of the idea that, if Congress passes a law leaving room for interpretation by the agency assigned to enforce it, the Take Care Clause is not violated even if the agency refuses to enforce, taking into account all the factors that it believes should influence the use of its resources.

The Supreme Court has also considered the Take Care Clause in cases such as Youngstown Sheet & Tube v. Sawyer (1952) and Myers v. United States (1926). In Youngstown, Justice Jackson observed that the Constitution does not disclose the measure of controls wielded by the modern presidential office, and that the centres of real power do not show on the face of the Constitution. In Myers, the Court held that the President has the exclusive power to remove executive officers, and that Congress cannot limit this power by requiring the President to obtain the advice and consent of the Senate before removing such officers.

The Take Care Clause has also played a central role in momentous constitutional disputes, including debates regarding the scope of presidential power, and the impeachment of two Presidents, Andrew Johnson and William Clinton, who were both impeached by the House for allegedly violating their Take Care Clause duties.

The precise meaning of the Clause remains a subject of debate, with scholars interpreting it as granting the President broad enforcement authority, while also serving as a limitation on that power by underscoring the executive's duty to faithfully execute the laws of Congress and not disregard them.

Faithful execution

The phrase "shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed" is part of the US Constitution's Article II, Section 3, which outlines the duties of the President. This clause, known as the Take Care Clause, imposes a duty on the President to ensure that the laws of the United States are faithfully executed. While the precise meaning of the clause has been debated and remains unclear, it has been used to justify broad exercises of executive power.

The "faithful execution" language in the clause suggests that the President has a responsibility to ensure that laws are carried out with diligence, care, good faith, honesty, and impartiality. This interpretation is supported by the historical context of the clause, which dates back to medieval England and the Magna Carta. At its core, the clause is designed to limit the President's power and prevent the unchecked authority of a king.

The Supreme Court and lower courts have ruled on the duties of executive agencies in applying the laws under their assigned duties, but the outer limits of discretion under the Take Care Clause have never been fully defined. One significant ruling was the 1985 case of Heckler v. Chaney, which upheld the idea that if Congress passes a law with leeway for the enforcing agency, the Take Care Clause is not violated even if the agency refuses to enforce it.

The Take Care Clause potentially implicates at least five categories of executive power:

• Powers directly conferred upon the President by the Constitution.
• Powers conferred upon the President by congressional acts.
• Powers that congressional acts confer upon heads of departments and other executive agencies.
• Power that stems implicitly from the duty to enforce the criminal statutes of the United States.
• Power to carry out ministerial duties, where an executive officer has limited discretion in the occasion or manner of their discharge.

In conclusion, the phrase "shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed" imposes a duty on the President to ensure diligent and honest execution of the laws, with the intent to prevent unchecked presidential power. While the precise meaning of the clause remains open to interpretation, it serves as an important check on executive power and a reminder of the President's responsibility to respect the work of Congress.

Congressional direction

The "Take Care Clause", also known as the "Faithful Execution Clause", is a provision in Article II, Section 3 of the US Constitution, which states that the President "shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed". This clause has been interpreted to grant the President broad enforcement authority, while also serving as a limitation on that power, as it mandates that the President faithfully executes the laws of Congress and does not disregard them.

The exact meaning of the clause has been debated, with the Supreme Court never explicitly ruling on its outer limits. The word "faithfully" implies a measure of discretion, but it is unclear what constitutes a "faithful" execution of a law. The records of the Philadelphia Convention, where the Constitution was drafted, offer little guidance, as the clause was not discussed in detail.

The clause has been interpreted to impose three interrelated requirements on the President:

• A duty not to act beyond the scope of the office
• A duty not to misuse office funds or take unauthorised profits
• A duty to execute the law diligently, carefully, in good faith, honestly, and impartially

These duties are similar to fiduciary duties in modern private law, and could be interpreted to limit the President's power to act in their own self-interest, or in bad faith. This interpretation would subordinate the President's power to that of Congress, limiting their ability to refuse to enforce statutes.

The Take Care Clause has been central to several constitutional disputes, including debates about the scope of presidential power, and impeachment proceedings against Presidents Andrew Johnson and William Clinton. The Supreme Court has also relied on the clause in cases such as Youngstown Sheet & Tube v. Sawyer (1952) and Myers v. United States (1926).

In summary, the "Take Care Clause" requires the President to ensure that the laws of Congress are faithfully executed, with the exact meaning of "faithful" execution being open to interpretation. This clause has been used to both expand and constrain presidential power, and continues to be a subject of debate and discussion.

Frequently asked questions