The Blame Game: Is It An Emotion?

The nature of blame has been a topic of philosophical debate for many years. While some argue that blame is fundamentally an emotion, others disagree. For a long time, the dominant view was that to blame someone is to feel an emotion towards them, such as anger, resentment, or indignation. However, this view has recently come under scrutiny.

Those who argue that blame is an emotion often emphasise the role of reactive attitudes, such as resentment, indignation, and guilt. These emotions are seen as a response to the actions, attitudes, or character of another person. On the other hand, cognitive theories of blame propose that blame is a judgment or evaluation of an agent's actions, attitudes, or character. This judgment may be accompanied by emotions, but it is not solely constituted by them.

It is important to note that the experience of blame can evoke a range of emotions in both the blamer and the person being blamed. For example, a person who blames others may feel superior, proud, or morally indignant. They may also experience fear that the blame will be redirected back onto them or that the social relationship will break down. Meanwhile, the person being blamed may feel guilt, shame, fear, or anger, especially if they feel they are being falsely accused.

Blame as an emotion

For a long time, the dominant view on the nature of blame was that to blame someone is to have an emotion toward them. This view is still widely held, although it has recently come under scrutiny.

When one person wrongs another, the latter may respond with resentment and a verbal rebuke. We also blame others for their attitudes and characters. Blaming scenarios typically involve a wide range of inward and outward responses to a wrongful or bad action, attitude, or character. These responses include beliefs, desires, expectations, emotions, and sanctions.

People who blame others feel emotions about the blamed and about themselves. They may view the other person with disgust, seeing them as wrong or bad for breaking social rules. A person who blames feels superior to the person who they are blaming, which is necessary for them to take the position of judge and jury. Disgust may be followed by anger at the action and the perpetrator. Anger can lead to unpleasant outbursts that seek to make the other person admit guilt. Anger and righteous indignation can lead to hate, which is more individually focused. Hate is a longer-term emotion that leads to sustained anger and attack. It is based on the belief that the other person is wholly bad, which is an easy conclusion from blame.

Blamers may also feel sorry for the person being blamed, especially if they realize that the person had diminished responsibility or was a victim of circumstance. They may also feel relief that they are not being blamed. When something goes wrong and responsibility is unclear, people may fear that blame will fall on them.

People who are blamed are likely to feel emotions just as strongly as those who blame. Guilt is the acceptance of having committed an act that is socially undesirable. Shame is similar to guilt but is more about regret and the realization of the social impact of one's actions. When people are found guilty, the accuser seeks to make the perpetrator feel ashamed. When people have been accused, they may fear punishment, especially social exclusion. If they feel they are being falsely accused, they will probably feel a righteous anger at this unfair situation. If they are guilty, they may also feel anger at the events that led to their actions.

Blame and anger

The dominant view on the nature of blame has long been that blaming someone is to have an emotion toward them, such as anger, resentment, or indignation. This view is still widely held, although it has recently come under scrutiny.

Anger is an unthinking emotion that can lead to unpleasant outbursts, causing the other person to retreat and admit guilt. It can also lead to hate, which has a greater individual focus.

However, blame is a complex phenomenon that is not always driven by anger. For instance, a person who blames another may feel superior, proud, or disgusted. They may also fear that the blame will rebound onto them, or that the relationship with the other person will break down.

In some cases, the blamer may feel sorry for the person being blamed, especially if they realize that the person had diminished responsibility or was a victim of circumstance.

The person being blamed is also likely to experience a range of emotions, such as guilt, shame, fear, and anger (if they feel they are being unfairly accused).

Blame and guilt

The nature of blame has been a topic of philosophical debate for many years. One of the dominant views on blame is that it is an emotion directed towards someone else, such as anger, resentment, or indignation. In the case of self-blame, the emotion is guilt. This view is still widely held, although it has recently come under scrutiny.

When a person breaks values, others may view this with disgust, seeing the person as wrong or bad for breaking social rules. This feeling of disgust may be followed by or combined with anger at the action and the perpetrator. Anger is an unthinking emotion designed to drive a person to attack in the face of danger. In blame, it can lead to unpleasant outbursts that seek to cause the other person to retreat and admit guilt.

Anger and indignation can lead to hate, which is a longer-term emotion with a greater individual focus. Hate is based on the belief that the other person is wholly bad, which is an easy conclusion from blame.

However, some people who blame others may also feel sorry for the person being blamed, especially if they realize that the person had diminished responsibility in some way or was a victim of circumstance. This feeling of pity is typically reserved for those already in inferior positions, such as children, or friends with whom there is a good social bond.

People who are blamed are very likely to feel emotions every bit as strongly as those who blame. Guilt is the acceptance of having committed an act that is socially undesirable. If the person feels responsible, they may feel guilty even before they are accused.

Shame is similar to guilt but is more about regret and the realization of the social impact of one's actions. When people are found guilty, the accuser seeks to make the perpetrator feel ashamed.

When people have been accused, whether they are guilty or not, they may fear punishment, particularly social exclusion. If they feel they are being falsely accused, they will probably feel a righteous anger at this unfair situation. If they are guilty, they may also feel anger at the events that led them to act in a way that resulted in blame.

Blame and shame

The Nature of Blame

Blame is a common reaction to something of negative normative significance about someone or their behaviour. It typically involves a range of inward and outward responses to a wrongful or bad action, attitude, or character. These responses include beliefs, desires, expectations, emotions, and sanctions.

Philosophers have typically asked two questions about blame: which reactions and interactions constitute blame, and when it is appropriate to respond in these ways.

The Nature of Shame

Shame is a painful sense of being inadequate, flawed, or unworthy. While it can stem from our own thoughts, it is often triggered when we are blamed by others for doing or not doing something. Shame involves a negative evaluation of the entire self in relation to social and moral standards.

The Relationship Between Blame and Shame

When we refer to shaming someone, we are talking about saying or doing something that brings up feelings of inadequacy, powerlessness, or embarrassment in the other person. This can be done through our words, including social media posts, as well as through actions such as teasing, bullying, shunning, ignoring, isolating, mocking, or ridiculing.

When we blame or shame someone, we are unlikely to be able to have a productive or supportive conversation with them, even if they are actually to blame. This is because blaming or shaming creates barriers to solutions.

Emotional Responses to Blame and Shame

People who blame others feel emotions such as disgust, anger, and fear. Disgust may be followed by anger at the action and the perpetrator, which can lead to unpleasant outbursts that seek to make the other person admit guilt. Anger can also lead to hate, which is a longer-term emotion that results in sustained recurrence of anger and attack.

On the other hand, people who are blamed are very likely to feel emotions such as guilt and shame. Guilt is the acceptance of having committed an act that is socially undesirable, while shame is more about regret and the realisation of the social impact of one's actions. When people are blamed, they may also feel fear, especially regarding potential punishment or social exclusion. They may also feel anger, whether at being falsely accused or at the events that led to the situation.

Blame and hate

The Nature of Blame

Blame has been a topic of interest for philosophers and psychologists alike, with various theories attempting to understand its underlying nature. One perspective, known as the emotional theory of blame, proposes that blame is inherently tied to specific emotions such as anger, resentment, indignation, and guilt. This view suggests that blaming someone elicits these emotions, which can drive individuals to attack or seek admission of guilt from the accused. Other theories, such as cognitive and conative theories, emphasise the role of judgments, evaluations, and desires in blame.

The Impact of Blame

Blaming others can have significant consequences for both the blamer and the blamed. For the blamer, feelings of superiority, pride, and moral indignation may arise, positioning themselves as morally superior. This sense of superiority can serve as a form of social comparison, boosting the blamer's ego and sense of importance. Additionally, blame can be a way to maintain control over a situation and avoid accepting responsibility or vulnerability. By blaming others, individuals can distance themselves from their own shortcomings and maintain a sense of power.

However, blame can also lead to fear and anxiety, especially if there is a concern that the blame might be redirected back onto the blamer. This fear may result in social relationships breaking down as trust and empathy diminish.

The Transition from Blame to Hate

While blame can be a transient emotion, it has the potential to evolve into a more sustained and intense emotion: hate. Hate is often characterised by a strong focus on the individual being blamed, and it can lead to recurrent feelings of anger and a desire to attack or cause harm. Hate may stem from the belief that the other person is wholly bad, which can be an easy conclusion to reach when blame is already present.

The Impact of Hate

Hate, like blame, can have far-reaching consequences. It can damage relationships, create an environment of distrust and judgment, and push people away. Additionally, hate can influence others to adopt a similar mindset, spreading a tendency to avoid responsibility and shift blame.

Moving Forward

When individuals find themselves caught in a cycle of blame and hate, it is essential to recognise the underlying emotions and their impact. Working on improving self-esteem and self-worth can be a crucial step, as it enables individuals to take responsibility for their actions and accept their capacity for error. Seeking professional help, such as therapy or counselling, can provide valuable support in repairing relationships, improving communication, and developing empathy.

Frequently asked questions