Artistic Expression: Pure Emotion Or Something More?

Art and emotion have a complex and multifaceted relationship. It is widely believed that art can evoke emotions in its audience, and that the capacity of art to arouse emotions is a natural and unproblematic fact. However, the nature of these emotional experiences and how they are perceived, represented, and evaluated on a subjective, bodily, and cognitive level is heavily debated.

Artworks can be divided into two categories: representational and non-representational or abstract. Examples of representational art include fiction, landscape paintings, and pop songs, while expressionist paintings and instrumental music fall under the category of non-representational art. Both types of art can elicit affective responses in audiences, but the ways in which they do so differ.

Representational art often elicits emotional responses from viewers by presenting them with fictional characters and situations that they can empathize with or feel pity for. This raises the question of how viewers can feel genuine emotions towards entities that they know do not exist. One solution proposed by Kendal Walton is the concept of 'quasi-emotions', where viewers are not truly feeling emotions like fear or pity, but are instead pretending to experience these emotions. Another theory, put forward by Peter Kivy, suggests that viewers can have genuine emotional responses to representational art, but the objects of these emotions are not the fictional characters or situations themselves, but rather the real-world references or analogues that the art brings to mind.

Non-representational art, on the other hand, does not represent any specific entities or situations, so how can it evoke emotions? One theory, the 'contour' or 'resemblance' theory, suggests that non-representational art can evoke emotions by resembling characteristic expressions of human emotion. For example, a slow and heavy piece of music may evoke sadness because it resembles the way a depressed person might walk or behave.

While the specific ways in which art evokes emotions are debated, there is no doubt that art and emotion are deeply intertwined. Artists create art as a way to grapple with their feelings, and viewers are drawn to these artworks because the emotions they convey are universal.

Art and the expression of pure emotion

Art and emotion have always been intertwined, with the emotional responses of viewers being regarded as the keystone to experiencing art. The creation of an emotional experience has been argued as the purpose of artistic expression.

The Expression of Emotion in Art

Artworks can evoke a range of emotions in their viewers, from joy and pleasure to fear, anger, and disgust. These emotions are often regarded as the keystone to experiencing art, and the creation of an emotional experience has been argued as the purpose of artistic expression. Evolutionary ancestry has hard-wired humans to have affective responses to certain patterns and traits, and art containing symmetry is typically approached and positively valenced by humans. For example, bright, open landscapes often evoke feelings of beauty, relaxation, or happiness, while dark and obscure images elicit emotions of anxiety and fear.

Art as Emotional Regulation

Art is also used as an emotional regulator, most notably in art therapy, which allows people to express their emotions and find meaning in their art to facilitate healing. Creating art can serve as a method of short-term mood regulation, either through venting or distraction. Venting through art involves using art to attend to and discharge negative emotions, while distraction involves creating art to oppose or distract from negative emotions. Research has shown that distractive art-making activities tend to improve mood more effectively than venting.

Expressionism and Emotional Art

The Expressionist art movement, which emerged in the early 20th century, specifically prioritised the personal and emotional in art, with subject matter and accuracy being secondary concerns. Expressionist artists brought their emotions into their depictions, elevating their emotional interpretations over any sense of trying to convey objective truth. This movement challenged centuries of artistic tradition and inspired numerous 21st-century artists to let their emotions take the reins.

The Complexity of Emotional Responses

The relationship between art and emotion is complex and multifaceted. While it is generally agreed that art can readily evoke emotions, the nature of these experiences and how they are perceived and represented on subjective, bodily, and evaluative levels is heavily debated. Individual factors such as empathy and art expertise also play a role in how people experience and express emotions through art.

In conclusion, art and the expression of pure emotion are deeply intertwined. Art has the capacity to arouse emotions in its audience, and these emotional responses are a fundamental aspect of the art experience. Artists use their creations as a means of expressing their emotions, and viewers are drawn to these works because the emotions they evoke are universal and relatable.

The psychology of art and emotion

The interplay between art and emotion has been the subject of extensive study in psychology, with emotional responses often regarded as the keystone to experiencing art. Art is a human activity that involves the conscious expression of feelings, and it can evoke a range of emotions in its audience, from joy and pleasure to fear, anger, and disgust.

The Nature of Emotional Responses to Art

While it is generally agreed that art can readily evoke emotions, the nature of these emotional experiences is heavily debated. The emotional impact of art can be influenced by various factors, including the subject matter, colour schemes, and dramatic narratives. Additionally, individual differences, such as empathy and art expertise, can also play a role in how people perceive and respond to emotions in art.

The Role of Cognition in Art Appreciation

Cognitive factors, such as understanding, fluency, and expertise, can significantly influence the interplay between emotions and aesthetic evaluations. Providing contextual information, such as titles or artist statements, can enhance viewers' understanding and appreciation of art, leading to more positive emotional responses.

The Complex Relationship Between Art and Emotion

The relationship between art and emotion is complex and multifaceted. Art can evoke a range of emotions, including negative emotions, and people often seek out art that elicits these feelings. This paradox of art and negative emotion has been a subject of philosophical inquiry, with various theories attempting to explain why people are drawn to art that arouses unpleasant emotions.

The Therapeutic Potential of Art

Art can also serve as a form of emotional regulation and therapy. Art therapy provides individuals with a means to express and process their emotions, find meaning in their art, and cope with difficult feelings. Additionally, creating art can be a form of short-term mood regulation, allowing individuals to vent negative emotions or distract themselves from them.

Expressionism and the Emotional in Art

The Expressionist art movement, which emerged in the early 20th century, specifically prioritised the emotional over the physical or objective. Expressionist artists sought to evoke intense emotional responses through their use of unnatural forms, colours, and compositions, often inspired by the anxieties and isolation of modern life. This movement challenged centuries of artistic tradition and continues to influence modern art.

In conclusion, the psychology of art and emotion is a complex and multifaceted field that explores how art evokes emotions, how these emotions are perceived and experienced, and the therapeutic potential of art in processing and regulating emotions. While the relationship between art and emotion is complex, it is clear that art has the power to arouse, express, and reflect a wide range of emotional states, contributing to its enduring appeal and significance.

Art as emotional regulation

Art is a powerful tool for emotional regulation, and its ability to evoke emotions in audiences is widely acknowledged. This regulation can take the form of venting or distraction, allowing individuals to process and release their emotions. Art therapy, for instance, uses artistic activities to help people express their emotions and find meaning in their creations, aiding in trauma healing.

The impact of art on emotions can be observed through subjective and bodily responses. For instance, individuals may smile more at emotionally positive art and frown at negative pieces. Additionally, higher empathy levels are associated with stronger emotional responses, while art experts, influenced by cognitive factors, exhibit less congruence between emotions and evaluations.

Art has the unique ability to trigger multiple emotions simultaneously, known as "meta-emotions." This complexity arises from the interplay of emotions and cognitions, creating valuable, intense, and sometimes pleasurable aesthetic experiences.

Furthermore, the emotional nature of art is evident in the Expressionist movement, which prioritises the personal and emotional over objective reality. Expressionist artists, such as Edvard Munch and Marc Chagall, bring their emotions into their depictions, elevating their interpretations above any sense of objective truth.

The power of art in emotional regulation is undeniable, offering individuals a means to explore, understand, and manage their emotions.

Art and negative emotion

Art is widely thought to be a central part of our dealings with emotions. It seems obvious that we can feel sadness or pity for fictional characters, fear at the view of threatening monsters on the movie screen, and joy upon listening to upbeat, happy songs.

However, the nature of these experiences and how they are perceived and represented on a subjective, bodily, and evaluative level is heavily debated.

The paradox of tragedy arises when the following three theses are held simultaneously:

• We commonly do not pursue activities that elicit negative emotions.
• We often have negative emotions in response to fictional works.
• We commonly pursue an engagement with fictional works that we know will elicit negative emotions.

The paradox of tragedy is not a formal paradox. The fact that many of us pursue activities that produce painful experiences is not logically problematic. The problem is explaining why many of us are so eager to seek out an engagement with works of fiction when they know it will result in negative emotions.

Theories and Models of Elicited Emotions

There are two broad classes of theories that attempt to solve the paradox of tragedy:

• Theories that appeal to pleasure
• Theories that appeal to entities other than pleasure

Pleasure-Centred Solutions

One common way to characterise the paradox of tragedy is by asking how we can derive pleasure from artworks that tend to elicit unpleasant states in its audience.

#### Intellectual Pleasure

One solution is that the pain that may result from an engagement with fictional works is compensated by pleasure derived from either the work or some other source. For example, the pleasure that is derived from our getting to know more about monsters in horror films can compensate for the unpleasant states we may initially experience.

#### No Essential Valence

Another solution is to deny that the 'negative' emotions we feel in response to fiction are necessarily unpleasant states. According to Kendall Walton and Alex Neill, when responding emotionally to an undesirable situation, we may confuse the undesirability of the situation with the perceived nature of the emotion.

Non-Pleasure-Centred Solutions

Theories that appeal to entities other than pleasure to explain the paradox of tragedy do not take pleasure to be the main factor that explains our willingness to engage with works of fiction eliciting negative emotions.

#### Relief from Boredom and Rich Experience

One theory is that we pursue an engagement with tragedy because we want relief from boredom. As life can sometimes be dull, we may find it better to feel any emotion, even negative ones, as long as it delivers us from our boredom.

#### Pluralism about Reasons for Emotional Engagement

Another theory is that there are many motivating reasons for which we pursue an engagement with the relevant fictions. We expect from an engagement with any particular work of fiction more benefits than costs, benefits that can be realised by a variety of things: knowledge, a sense of being alive, an appreciation of aesthetic properties, etc.

Art as Emotional Regulation

Art is also used as an emotional regulator, most often in Art Therapy sessions. Art therapy is a form of therapy that uses artistic activities such as painting, sculpture, sketching, and other crafts to allow people to express their emotions and find meaning in that art to find trauma and ways to experience healing.

Types of Elicited Emotions

There is debate among researchers as to what types of emotions works of art can elicit. These can be defined emotions such as anger, confusion or happiness, or a general feeling of aesthetic appreciation.

Knowledge Emotions

Knowledge emotions deal with reactions to thinking and feeling, such as interest, confusion, awe, and surprise. They often stem from self-analysis of what the viewer knows, expects, and perceives.

Hostile Emotions

Hostile emotions toward art are often very visible in the form of anger or frustration, and can result in censorship. These emotions often motivate aggression, self-assertion, and violence, and arise from the perception of the artist's deliberate trespass onto the expectations of the viewer.

Self-Conscious Emotions

Self-conscious emotions are responses that reflect upon the self and one's actions, such as pride, guilt, shame, regret and embarrassment. These are much more complex emotions, and involve assessing events as agreeing with one's self-perception or not, and adjusting one's behaviour accordingly.

Art and positive emotion

Art evokes a range of emotions in its audience, from joy and pleasure to fear and disgust. While it is generally agreed that art can readily evoke emotions, the nature of these experiences and how they are perceived and represented on a subjective, bodily, and evaluative level is heavily debated.

Artworks that are well-made and complex are more likely to stimulate deep emotional responses. For example, a beautifully painted work depicting the crucifixion is likely to make people who understand its story weep. Similarly, art that contains symmetry is usually approached and positively valenced to humans because symmetry helped our ancestors recognize danger, food, and mates.

Art can also evoke positive emotions by creating what Noy & Noy-Sharav call "meta-emotions", or multiple emotions that are triggered at the same time. For instance, art that is technically proficient and well-composed but lacks complexity may not produce "meta-emotions". However, providing additional information about a work of art, such as its title, description, or the artist's statement, can increase viewers' understanding and appreciation, leading to more positive emotions.

Art can also be used as an emotional regulator, most often in Art Therapy sessions. Creating art can serve as a method of short-term mood regulation through either venting or distraction. Distractive art-making activities, such as creating happy drawings to counter negative emotions, have been shown to improve mood more effectively than venting.

Furthermore, the capacity of artworks to arouse emotions in their audience is a natural and unproblematic fact. Good art should not leave us cold, and we often seek out art that evokes emotions, even if they are negative. For example, many people are eager to listen to seemingly distressing musical works or watch films that arouse similar feelings.

Overall, emotions play a central role in our dealings with art, and a proper understanding of our emotional responses to art can shed light on its value.

Frequently asked questions