The Expertise Conundrum: America's Trust Issues

In his article, How America Lost Faith in Expertise, Tom Nichols explores the growing phenomenon of Americans' disdain for expertise and the resulting consequences for democracy. Nichols argues that the rejection of expert opinion has become a way for individuals to demonstrate their autonomy and protect their fragile egos, particularly regarding public policy issues. This trend is not simply a matter of scepticism towards experts but signifies a collapse in the division between professionals and laypeople. Nichols highlights how this issue extends beyond politics, with individuals from various sectors, such as medicine and education, facing similar challenges. He attributes this development partly to the abundance of information available online, which has accelerated the breakdown of communication between experts and the general public. Furthermore, Nichols discusses the role of conspiracy theories and confirmation bias in undermining interpersonal discourse. Ultimately, he calls for a restoration of the symbiotic relationship between ordinary citizens and intellectual elites to address this pressing issue.

The rejection of expertise as a demonstration of autonomy

In the modern American social climate, citizens seem to be unwilling to engage in meaningful conversations with experts. Instead, they want their opinions to be valued based on the strength of their feelings on a particular topic. This is not a new problem; people have always lacked knowledge about science, politics, or geography. However, the bigger concern today is that Americans have reached a point where ignorance—especially regarding established knowledge in public policy—is seen as a virtue. Rejecting the advice of experts has become a way for Americans to assert their autonomy and demonstrate their independence from "nefarious elites". This is not the same as the traditional American distaste for intellectuals and know-it-alls; it indicates a shift from a natural skepticism of expert claims to the death of the ideal of expertise itself.

This shift is fuelled by the Google-fuelled, Wikipedia-based, blog-sodden collapse of the division between professionals and laypeople, teachers and students, knowers and wonderers. It is important to note that this does not mean the death of actual expert abilities or knowledge in specific areas. There will always be specialists, such as doctors, lawyers, and engineers, whom people rely on for technical expertise. However, this reliance is more like using established knowledge as an off-the-shelf convenience rather than valuing the expertise itself. For example, people might ask a doctor to stitch a cut on their leg but reject the doctor's advice on improving their diet.

The rejection of expertise is also driven by the absence of "metacognition" among laypeople. Metacognition refers to the ability to step back and see one's own cognitive processes in perspective. It is established through the pursuit of expertise, and it allows individuals to recognize their errors in thought and action. Lacking metacognition, people tend to overestimate their abilities and are unable to recognize their mistakes. This makes it challenging to educate or inform them, as they tend to make things up when in doubt and are resistant to learning from experts.

Additionally, the prevalence of easily accessible information on the Internet has accelerated the collapse of communication between experts and laypeople. While the Internet provides an abundance of information, it does not always provide reliable or reputable sources. As a result, people often navigate through a blizzard of useless or misleading information, making it challenging to distinguish between facts and opinions.

In conclusion, the rejection of expertise by Americans is a complex issue with far-reaching implications. It is driven by a desire to assert autonomy, protect fragile egos, and insulate themselves from being told they are wrong. This shift has led to a collapse in the division between professionals and laypeople and has been accelerated by the abundance of information on the Internet. Restoring trust and mutual respect between experts and citizens is crucial to prevent the corruption of democracy and expertise.

The death of expertise

In his article, "How America Lost Faith in Expertise", Tom Nichols explores the growing phenomenon of Americans' disdain for expertise and the implications for democracy. He argues that the rejection of expert opinion has become a way for individuals to assert their autonomy and protect their fragile egos, particularly when it comes to issues like public policy. This trend is not simply a matter of scepticism towards experts but signifies the death of expertise itself.

Nichols highlights how this shift has led to the erosion of principled, informed arguments, replaced by angry shouting matches devoid of factual basis. He attributes this not only to the public but also to experts themselves, who sometimes stretch their expertise beyond their specific areas of specialisation, engage in intentional deception, or rent out their authority to the highest bidder.

The article also discusses the impact of the internet and easy access to information, which has accelerated the collapse of communication between experts and laypeople. While technology provides an abundance of information, it does little to help individuals navigate the vast amount of content and distinguish reliable sources from misleading or false ones.

Nichols emphasises the need for a symbiotic relationship between "ordinary citizens" and "intellectual elites", where citizens educate themselves and engage in productive discourse with experts. He warns that the death of expertise threatens the very foundation of democracy, leading to mob rule or elitist technocracy.

The impact of the internet

The internet has been a key factor in the death of expertise in America. While it is not the primary problem, the digital age has accelerated the breakdown of communication between experts and laypeople. The internet offers an "apparent shortcut to erudition", allowing people to mimic intellectualism by indulging in an illusion of expertise.

The internet is a double-edged sword. On the one hand, it provides easy access to a wealth of information and knowledge. On the other hand, it is a repository of misinformation, conspiracy theories, and biased content. The sheer volume of information available online can be overwhelming, and without the necessary research skills and critical thinking abilities, people may struggle to distinguish reliable sources from misleading or false ones.

The internet has also contributed to the creation of echo chambers, where people only interact with like-minded individuals and are exposed to a narrow range of perspectives that confirm their pre-existing beliefs. Social media platforms, in particular, have been criticised for amplifying these echo chambers, entrenching users in their own political and intellectual biases.

While the internet has made it easier for people to access information, it has also created challenges in terms of verifying the accuracy and reliability of that information. The convenience of the internet is of limited benefit to those who lack the skills to evaluate the quality of online sources.

The role of the media

The media plays a crucial role in shaping public opinion and informing democratic discourse. However, in recent years, Americans have lost faith in the news media, with only 34% of the public saying they trust the news media as of 2023, and a mere 14% among Republicans. This decline in trust has been attributed to several factors, including the rise of former President Donald Trump, the proliferation of fake news, and the failure of the media to hold power to account.

The Trump Administration

The Trump Administration waged a war on the press, with Trump himself referring to the news media as "the enemy of the American people." The administration barred certain major news organizations from briefings, suspended the credentials of journalists who were deemed too combative, and frequently dismissed unfavourable stories as "fake news." This systematic discrediting of the media worked to convince millions of Americans, particularly Trump supporters, to doubt and discredit news sources that did not align with the administration's narrative.

Fake News and the Internet

The internet has also played a significant role in the decline of trust in the media. With over a billion websites, people are often overwhelmed by the sheer amount of information available and struggle to discern reputable sources from fake news. This has led to the spread of misinformation and the creation of echo chambers, where individuals only consume news that aligns with their existing beliefs, further polarizing society.

Failure to Hold Power to Account

Historically, the media has also failed to adequately hold power to account. For example, during the Cold War, it was revealed that the CIA had co-opted journalists and news organizations to spread pro-government propaganda and conceal certain actions of the government. More recently, in the lead-up to the 2016 election, the media over-covered the Clinton email scandal, contributing to a negative perception of Clinton and potentially influencing the election outcome.

In conclusion, the media's loss of credibility in America is multi-faceted and has been decades in the making. While the internet and the rise of fake news have certainly played a role, the more insidious factors include the deliberate discrediting of the media by political figures and the failure of the media to adequately hold power to account. Restoring trust in the media will require a concerted effort to improve transparency, accountability, and impartiality in news reporting.

The relationship between experts and laypeople

This shift has led to a decline in principled, informed arguments, replaced by angry shouting matches. The public's mistrust of experts is fuelled by a perception that experts are "elites" who are out of touch with reality and serve their own interests rather than the public good. However, it is important to distinguish between experts and elites, as experts are individuals with specialised knowledge and skills who provide advice and education within their field.

The rejection of expertise has also been driven by the internet and new information technologies, which have provided an apparent shortcut to knowledge. Anyone can now access an abundance of information with a simple online search, blurring the lines between experts and laypeople. However, this abundance of information does not equate to knowledge or understanding, and the internet is filled with misleading or false content.

Conspiracy theories have also contributed to the breakdown of trust in experts, as they provide simple explanations for complex issues and are often unfalsifiable, allowing individuals to dismiss contradictory evidence as part of the conspiracy.

The consequences of this erosion of trust are significant, as it undermines the foundation of mutual respect and trust that is necessary for a functioning democracy. Experts and laypeople become warring factions, and democracy itself is at risk of decaying into mob rule or elitist technocracy.

To restore trust and rebuild the relationship between experts and laypeople, both sides must recognise their roles and responsibilities. Experts need to remember that they are servants of a democratic society, providing advice and education without expecting a veto. Laypeople, on the other hand, must accept that experts have specialised knowledge and skills that they do not possess, and that their opinions are not necessarily equal to those of experts, especially when it comes to complex issues.

By establishing mutual respect and recognising the value of expertise, it is possible to create a more informed and engaged citizenry, which is essential for a healthy democracy.

Frequently asked questions