Unveiling Islam: Exploring Faith And Violence

The question of whether Islam promotes violence is a highly contested topic. Some argue that the religion's core teachings are to blame for the violent extremism that has been witnessed across the globe. Others, however, believe that the violence stems from a misinterpretation of Islamic texts, and that the religion is, in fact, one of peace.

Islamic scriptures, including the Quran and the Hadith, contain passages that can be interpreted as promoting violence. For example, the Quran states, Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. These passages are often cited as evidence that Islam promotes violence against non-believers.

However, proponents of the view that Islam is a religion of peace argue that such passages are taken out of context and that the Quran justifies war only in self-defence or when Islam itself is under threat. They emphasise that the Quran equates a single murder with the killing of all humankind and that Prophet Muhammad defined the faithful as those most restrained from violence.

Moreover, while some Muslim clerics have interpreted Islamic texts to justify violence, others have developed non-violent Muslim theologies. The future of Islam and its relationship with the world will depend on which of these interpretations gains the support of the majority of Muslims.

The interpretation of Islamic texts

Islamic Texts and Violence

Islamic texts, such as the Quran and the Hadith, are often cited as evidence of the religion's inherently violent nature. Interpretations of these texts have been used to justify violent actions, including terrorism and extremism. For instance, certain passages in the Quran, known as the "sword verses," are seen as condoning violence against non-believers and are said to have "abrogated, cancelled, and replaced" verses calling for peace and tolerance. The Hadith, which records the traditions and sayings of Prophet Muhammad, also contains accounts of his military expeditions, which some interpret as a justification for armed jihad.

Islamic Texts and Peace

However, others argue that these texts are often taken out of context and that Islam is a religion of peace. They emphasize that the Quran equates a single murder with the killing of all humankind and saving a life with rescuing humanity. The Prophet Muhammad is quoted as defining the faithful as "those most restrained from violence." Additionally, Islam forbids sports that involve violence against animals or humans.

Furthermore, it is argued that the concept of "jihad," often translated as "holy war," is misinterpreted. In Arabic, jihad means to strive or struggle and can refer to a spiritual struggle against one's inner self, not just a physical struggle against enemies of Islam. Armed jihad is considered a last resort and is governed by strict rules, including the protection of civilians and non-military targets.

A Complex Reality

The reality is that the interpretation of Islamic texts is complex and multifaceted. While some passages can be interpreted as condoning violence, others emphasize peace and restraint. The duality within Islam allows for varying interpretations, and the context in which these texts are understood plays a crucial role in shaping their meaning.

The role of Islamic clerics

Islamic clerics play a significant role in shaping the interpretation and practice of Islam, particularly regarding the question of whether the religion promotes violence. While some clerics have been accused of preaching terrorism and inciting violence, there is also a group of clerics who are advocating for reforms and promoting a non-violent interpretation of Islamic teachings.

Some Islamic clerics have been accused of using their religious authority to promote terrorism and incite violence. For example, clerics like Zakir Naik, Maulana Samiul-Haq, and Abdullah al-Faisal have been accused of making hate speeches and justifying violent actions. These clerics often interpret Islamic scriptures, such as the Quran and Hadith, in a way that legitimizes terrorism and violent jihad. They may also advocate for the strict implementation of Sharia law, which includes harsh punishments such as beheading, flogging, and stoning in some Muslim countries.

On the other hand, there is a growing group of Islamic clerics who are recognized as reformers or "modifying Muslims." These clerics recognize the need for change within Islam to prevent its followers from being condemned to a cycle of political violence. They promote the separation of religion from politics and advocate for a more peaceful interpretation of Islamic teachings. Some clerics within this group, such as Abdul Ghaffar Khan, have developed alternative non-violent Muslim theologies.

Additionally, clerics who denounce terrorist attacks and claim to represent peaceful Islam are also trying to engage with Western governments. However, their refusal to acknowledge or repudiate the violent aspects of Islamic religious texts has led to criticism and limited ideological engagement with Western countries.

The relationship between Islam and politics

Islam has a long history of political engagement, with the religion's origins closely tied to the life and actions of the Prophet Muhammad. The first military rulings in Islam were formulated during Muhammad's time in Medina, where he established an Islamic state and drafted the Constitution of Medina. This document laid the foundation for the first Islamic state and addressed issues such as religious freedoms, security, and conflict resolution. The political ideals established during this period, including the importance of following Islamic law (sharia) and consulting with the governed (shura), have had a lasting impact on Islamic political thought.

Traditional political concepts in Islam include leadership by elected or selected successors of Muhammad, known as Caliphs in Sunni Islam and Imams in Shia Islam. The question of who should succeed Muhammad led to an early schism in Islam, with Sunnis believing in an elected caliph and Shiites advocating for a hereditary line of Imams from Muhammad's bloodline. This divide has had a significant influence on the political landscape of the Muslim world, with most modern Islamic political movements rooted in Sunni thought due to their numerical majority.

Islamic law, or sharia, plays a significant role in the political aspirations of many Muslims. Sharia is derived from the Quran and the sayings and practices of Muhammad (hadith and sunnah). It covers a range of topics, including criminal law, family law, and governance. While some Muslim-majority countries have fully adopted sharia as their legal system, others have incorporated it alongside secular laws, leading to ongoing debates about the compatibility of sharia with human rights and democratic principles.

The question of the compatibility of Islam with democracy is a subject of debate among Muslims. While some advocate for a strict implementation of sharia, others stress the importance of public interest, justice, and consultation (maslaha, 'adl, and shura). Still, others embrace liberal interpretations of Islam, promoting pluralism, freedom of thought, and gender equality. Polls suggest that most Muslims see no contradiction between democratic values and Islamic principles, desiring a political model that integrates democratic institutions with Islamic values.

Islamic political movements have evolved over time, reflecting changing social and political contexts. In response to Western colonialism, some Muslims advocated for violent resistance, while others embraced Western political and social ideas. More recently, the rise of Islamic extremism and terrorism has led to a wave of violent jihadist groups, such as al-Qaeda and ISIS. At the same time, democratic Islamist movements, such as the Muslim Brotherhood, have sought political change through electoral means. The future of the relationship between Islam and politics will depend on which of these competing visions gains traction among the majority of Muslims.

The influence of the Prophet Muhammad

On the other hand, others argue that the Prophet Muhammad promoted peace and non-violence. During his time in Mecca, Muhammad and his followers endured persecution and violence, and he preached tolerance, charity, and compassion. Even in Medina, when Muhammad had the power to retaliate against those who opposed him, he often responded with patience and forgiveness. For example, when a Bedouin man publicly assaulted him, Muhammad chose to respond gently and forgave him. The Prophet also showed compassion towards those who attempted to assassinate him and sought to de-escalate conflicts with the Jewish tribes in Medina.

The interpretation of the Prophet Muhammad's teachings and actions is a highly contested issue, with different groups emphasising different aspects of his life and teachings. While some focus on the military expeditions and battles, others highlight his efforts to establish peace and his forgiveness towards his enemies. Ultimately, the question of whether the Muslim faith promotes violence is shaped by the interpretation and understanding of the Prophet Muhammad's complex legacy.

The impact of Western intervention

Western intervention in the form of the "Global War on Terror" has been largely unsuccessful in eliminating the threat of violent Islamism. Despite military campaigns against Islamic extremist groups, these organisations continue to wreak havoc in countries like Syria, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Yemen, Nigeria and Afghanistan. Furthermore, Western countries have increasingly become targets of domestic terrorist attacks.

Western intervention has also been linked to a rise in Islamophobia, defined as an "irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against Islam or people who practice Islam". Hate crimes, workplace discrimination, and government surveillance and profiling of Muslims have increased in recent years. This has resulted in stress and feelings of unwelcome among Muslim Americans, who feel their physical appearance often plays a role in the harassment and profiling they experience.

On the other hand, Western intervention has also played a crucial role in countering violent extremism. Most governments in largely Muslim states are actively fighting extremism and terrorism, and many are allies of Western states in this effort. Partnerships between Muslim and non-Muslim states are seen as critical in containing the threat of violent extremism and limiting its impact outside predominantly Muslim countries, where the majority of incidents occur.

Overall, the impact of Western intervention is complex and multifaceted. While it has contributed to a climate of Islamophobia and failed to eliminate the threat of violent extremism, it has also been crucial in fostering international cooperation and partnerships to counter this extremism, recognising that religion is only one of many factors contributing to instability and violence in Muslim-majority states.

Frequently asked questions