Mormon Faith And Their Stance On The Death Penalty

The Mormon faith has a complicated history with the death penalty. While the largest Mormon denomination, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church), has denied the validity of the doctrine of blood atonement since 1889, some fundamentalist splinter groups still adhere to it. Blood atonement is the belief that, for certain sins, the sinner should be killed in a way that allows their blood to be shed upon the ground as a sacrificial offering, so they do not become a son of perdition.

The LDS Church has neither promoted nor opposed capital punishment, leaving it to civil authorities to determine whether and how to punish convicted criminals. However, some individual church authorities have connected the doctrine to state-sponsored capital punishment, teaching that it is preferable for convicted murderers to shed their own blood as punishment for their sins.

The concept of blood atonement is often associated with the 19th-century Mormon Reformation, during which leaders of the LDS Church used forceful and violent preaching to curtail backsliding and inspire repentance. Despite this, the LDS Church has made repeated and consistent disavowals of the doctrine and currently teaches the infinite and all-encompassing atonement of Jesus Christ, which makes forgiveness of sin and salvation possible for all people.

The Mormon faith and blood atonement

The Mormon faith, or the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church), has denied the validity of the blood atonement doctrine since 1889. However, the practice of blood atonement was adhered to in the history of Mormonism and is still followed by some fundamentalist splinter groups.

Blood atonement is the practice of shedding the blood of a sinner as a sacrificial offering to atone for an eternal sin. This doctrine arose among early Mormon leaders and was significantly promoted by Brigham Young, the second president of the LDS Church, during the Mormon Reformation when he governed the Utah Territory as a near-theocracy. Young taught that sinners should voluntarily choose to practice the doctrine but that it should only be enforced by a complete theocracy. He considered it more charitable to sacrifice a life than to see them endure eternal torment in the afterlife.

According to Young, eternal sins that required blood atonement included apostasy, theft, and fornication. However, sodomy and adultery were two sins that did not need blood atonement. Young's teachings contributed to a culture of violence in early Utah and may have influenced the Mountain Meadows massacre of 1857, in which a Mormon militia led by John D. Lee killed Arkansan emigrants.

While the LDS Church has formally repudiated the doctrine of blood atonement multiple times, it has been referenced by alt-right Mormon groups and fundamentalist splinter groups that claim to follow the original teachings of Joseph Smith and Brigham Young.

The Mormon view on murder

Murder is considered a grave sin in the Mormon faith. In the past, the Mormon doctrine of ""blood atonement" taught that some sins, including murder, were so grievous that only the voluntary shedding of the sinner's own blood could satisfy the eternal demands of justice and secure the possibility of salvation. This doctrine was most notably promoted by Brigham Young, who led the Mormon Reformation of 1856-57, but it was never the consensus view of the church and was formally repudiated in 1889.

The largest Mormon denomination, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church), has made repeated and consistent disavowals of the doctrine of blood atonement, including in a formal statement in 2010, which emphasised their belief in "the infinite and all-encompassing atonement of Jesus Christ, which makes forgiveness of sin and salvation possible for all people".

Despite this, the LDS Church has remained officially neutral on the question of capital punishment, leaving it to civil authorities to determine whether and how to punish convicted criminals. This has been interpreted by many Mormons as tacit approval for the practice. The Encyclopedia of Mormonism concludes that "capital punishment is viewed in the doctrines of the Church to be an appropriate penalty for murder".

The Mormon view on capital punishment

Blood Atonement

Blood atonement is a historical practice in Mormonism, where the atonement of Jesus is believed to be insufficient for redeeming certain eternal sins. To atone for these sins, it was taught that the sinner's blood must be shed as a sacrificial offering. This doctrine was notably promoted by Brigham Young, who governed the Utah Territory during the Mormon Reformation. Young taught that blood atonement should be voluntary and only enforced by a complete theocracy. However, he also believed that it was more charitable to sacrifice a life than to see them endure eternal torment in the afterlife.

The blood atonement doctrine influenced laws in Utah that allowed capital punishment by firing squad or decapitation. While there is no clear evidence that Brigham Young enforced blood atonement for apostasy, there are suggestions that it was carried out at the local church level, possibly contributing to a culture of violence.

Modern LDS Church Views

The LDS Church has formally repudiated the blood atonement doctrine multiple times since Brigham Young's era. In 1978, LDS apostle Bruce R. McConkie stated that while certain sins are beyond the atoning power of Christ, blood atonement is only applicable in a theocracy. The LDS Church released another statement in 2010, reaffirming their belief in the atonement of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of sins and salvation for all people.

Regarding capital punishment, the LDS Church takes a neutral stance, neither promoting nor opposing it. They regard it as a matter to be decided solely by civil law. This position has been interpreted by many Mormons as tacit approval for capital punishment. The quasi-official Encyclopedia of Mormonism concludes that "capital punishment is viewed in the doctrines of the Church to be an appropriate penalty for murder."

Scriptural References

In summary, while the LDS Church has officially rejected the blood atonement doctrine, its historical influence and the interpretation of scriptural passages have shaped Mormon views on capital punishment. The LDS Church's neutral stance on capital punishment, combined with scriptural references, has led many Mormons to support it, often with secular arguments or appeals to scripture. However, a minority of Mormons, citing theological and humanitarian arguments, favor the abolition of the death penalty.

The Mormon view on the death penalty

Blood Atonement

Blood atonement is a practice in the history of Mormonism, where the atonement of Jesus is believed to not redeem an eternal sin. To atone for such a sin, the sinner should be killed, with their blood shed upon the ground as a sacrificial offering, so they do not become a son of perdition. This doctrine was significantly promoted during the Mormon Reformation when Brigham Young governed the Utah Territory as a near-theocracy. While the LDS Church has denied the validity of this doctrine since 1889, it has resurfaced in modern times among some fundamentalist splinter groups, who claim to follow the original teachings of Joseph Smith and Brigham Young.

The LDS Church's Position

The LDS Church, the largest Mormon denomination, has taken a neutral stance on the death penalty, leaving it to civil authorities to determine whether and how to punish convicted criminals. They regard the question of whether and when the state should impose capital punishment as a matter to be decided solely by the prescribed processes of civil law. They neither promote nor oppose capital punishment. This position has been interpreted by many Mormons as tacit approval for the practice, especially considering the Church's history of forceful and violent preaching on blood atonement.

Scriptural Support

Support for the death penalty can be found in both the Old Testament and the Book of Mormon. The Book of Mormon states that "the law requireth the life of him who hath murdered" and that "wo unto the murderer who deliberately killeth, for he shall die". However, Mormons believe that the retributive Mosaic law was "fulfilled" by the gospel preached by Jesus Christ, suggesting that the ritual and legal aspects of Israelite religion are no longer in force. This creates a theological conundrum for Mormons, as they must navigate which pre-Christian scriptures retain their authority and which can be dismissed.

In summary, while the LDS Church has officially rejected blood atonement theology, its neutral stance on capital punishment and the existence of scriptural support for the death penalty have led to varying views among Mormons. Some individual church authorities have even connected blood atonement doctrine to state-sponsored capital punishment.

The Mormon view on the Mosaic law

The Mosaic law, as outlined in the Old Testament, includes several references to capital punishment. For instance, in Exodus 20:13, one of the Ten Commandments states: "Thou shalt not kill". However, in Deuteronomy 19, the Lord explains that those guilty of manslaughter may be spared the death penalty, while those who commit murder with malice must be put to death.

The Mormon faith, or the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church), has a complex relationship with the Mosaic law and capital punishment. While the LDS Church has never officially promoted or opposed capital punishment, it has acknowledged that there are times when capital punishment is appropriate. This stance is informed by specific interpretations of various scriptures, including those from the Old Testament, the New Testament, and the Book of Mormon.

In the Book of Mormon, it is stated that "the law of Moses" requires capital punishment for the crime of murder. However, it also suggests that the atonement of Jesus fulfils this law, indicating that blood sacrifices are no longer necessary. This interpretation is supported by the Bible, which states that the law of Moses was "fulfilled" by the gospel preached by Jesus Christ.

Despite these scriptures, the LDS Church has historically struggled with the concept of blood atonement, which suggests that some sins, such as murder, can only be atoned for by the sinner's own death. This doctrine was notably promoted by Brigham Young, the second president of the LDS Church, during the Mormon Reformation of 1856-57. Young taught that in a complete theocracy, the shedding of a murderer's blood may be required as part of their atonement. While Young emphasised that this doctrine should only be enforced by a theocratic government, it nonetheless influenced the culture of violence in pioneer Utah and may have contributed to incidents such as the Mountain Meadows Massacre.

The LDS Church has since formally repudiated the doctrine of blood atonement on multiple occasions, most recently in 2010. In this statement, the church emphasised its belief in "the infinite and all-encompassing atonement of Jesus Christ, which makes forgiveness of sin and salvation possible for all people". Despite this, individual church authorities have continued to connect the doctrine to state-sponsored capital punishment, and some Latter-day Saints have interpreted this as tacit approval for the practice.

In summary, while the LDS Church does not officially promote or oppose capital punishment, its complex relationship with the Mosaic law and the concept of blood atonement has influenced the views of many of its members.

Frequently asked questions