California's Stance On Faith Healing: Exploring The Law

Faith healing is the practice of prayer and gestures, such as laying on of hands, believed to elicit divine intervention in spiritual and physical healing. In the US, several states have religious exemptions in their civil and criminal codes that allow parents to refuse medical treatment for their children on religious grounds. California is one such state. It has a religious exception to misdemeanor child neglect with no judicial bypass provision. In one case, a child died after her parents, following Christian Scientist beliefs, did not seek biomedical intervention. However, California is among the states that have repealed some or all religious exemptions from the duty to provide medical care for a sick child.

California has a religious exception to misdemeanour child neglect with no judicial bypass provision

Faith healing is the practice of prayer and gestures, such as laying on of hands, that are believed to elicit divine intervention in spiritual and physical healing. In the United States, most states have laws prohibiting child abuse and neglect. However, many states also have religious exemptions to these laws, allowing parents to withhold medical treatment from their children if it conflicts with their religious beliefs.

California is one of the states with a religious exception to misdemeanour child neglect with no judicial bypass provision. This means that parents who treat their children through prayer or other religious means, instead of seeking medical treatment, can be exempt from prosecution for misdemeanour child neglect. However, this exemption does not apply to felony charges, as seen in the case of People v. Rippberger, where the parents were charged with felony child endangerment.

The existence of religious exemptions to child abuse and neglect laws is a controversial issue. While some argue that it accommodates the religious freedom of parents, others argue that it endangers the lives of children by allowing them to be deprived of necessary medical care. In recent years, there have been efforts in some states, including California, to repeal these exemptions.

The issue of faith healing and religious exemptions highlights the tension between religious freedom and the state's responsibility to protect the welfare of children. While adults are generally free to make their own medical decisions, the situation becomes more complex when it involves minors who are still legally under the care of their parents or guardians.

California has a religious exemption from tuberculosis testing of public school teachers

California has a religious exemption from tuberculosis testing for public school teachers. This means that public school teachers in California are not required to undergo tuberculosis testing if they have religious objections. This is just one of many religious exemptions from medical procedures that exist in various states across the US.

The existence of these exemptions can be traced back to the federal Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA), enacted in 1974. This Act required states to grant religious exemptions from child abuse and neglect laws in order to receive federal funding for child protection work. As a result, many states, including California, implemented religious exemptions from medical procedures, such as tuberculosis testing, for both children and adults.

While the federal requirement for religious exemptions was removed in 1983, it was added back into the text of CAPTA in 1996. This version of the law stated that CAPTA did not include "a Federal requirement that a parent or guardian provide a child any medical service or treatment against the religious beliefs of the parent or guardian." This change allowed states to continue offering religious exemptions from medical procedures, including tuberculosis testing for public school teachers in California.

However, it is important to note that these exemptions have been a subject of controversy. Critics argue that relying solely on faith healing without seeking modern medical treatment can have negative public health consequences and has been linked to higher mortality rates and reduced life expectancy. In recent years, there have been efforts to repeal some of these exemptions, and several states have successfully removed or modified their religious exemptions from medical procedures.

California offers religious exemptions from physical examinations of school children

Faith healing is the practice of prayer and gestures such as laying on of hands, believed by some to elicit divine intervention in spiritual and physical healing. While virtually all scientists and philosophers dismiss faith healing as pseudoscience, it is regarded as a Christian belief that God heals people through the power of the Holy Spirit.

In the United States, the First Amendment gives some protection to parents who choose faith healing over medical treatment for their children. However, this protection is not absolute, and there are varying laws regarding faith healing and child neglect across different states.

While California does offer some religious exemptions, it is one of 19 states that do not allow religious defences for felony crimes against children. In addition, it is one of six states that require all schoolchildren to be immunized without exception for religious belief.

California has statutes excusing students with religious objections from studying about disease in school

Faith healing is the practice of prayer and gestures such as the laying on of hands, believed by some to elicit divine intervention in spiritual and physical healing. In the United States, the First Amendment gives some protection to parents who wish to practice faith healing on their children instead of seeking medical treatment. However, this does not override a parent's duty of care, and in some states, parents can be prosecuted for child neglect or manslaughter if they refuse to seek medical treatment for their child on religious grounds.

In the case of People v. Rippberger, California's religious exception was interpreted narrowly by the court. The parents of an eight-month-old child who died of acute purulent meningitis were charged with felony child endangerment, as the court found that the religious exception only applied to misdemeanor liability and not felony liability.

California is one of 19 states that still allow religious defences for felony crimes against children

Faith healing is the practice of prayer and gestures, such as laying on of hands, that are believed to elicit divine intervention in spiritual and physical healing. In the US, faith healing is often associated with Christian sects, such as Christian Scientists and the Followers of Christ.

In California, faith healing is not permitted as a defence for crimes of child neglect or abuse. However, California is one of 19 states that still allow religious defences for felony crimes against children. These religious defences were introduced as a result of the federal Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA) in 1974, which required states to include religious exemptions in their child protection laws in order to receive federal funding. Although this requirement was removed in 1983, and CAPTA was reauthorized without the religious exemption in 2003, the religious defences remain in place in many states.

In California, 38 states and the District of Columbia have religious exemptions in their civil codes on child abuse or neglect. However, only 15 states have religious defences to felony crimes against children, and 12 states have religious defences to misdemeanours. These religious defences allow parents to withhold medical treatment from their children, even in life-threatening situations, and protect them from criminal liability.

While these religious exemptions are meant to accommodate the teachings of certain religious groups, they have been criticised for endangering the lives of children. In some cases, children have died unnecessarily due to their parents' refusal to seek medical treatment for religious reasons.

Frequently asked questions