Historical Facts: Foundation Or Fluff For Faith?

Do Historical Matters Matter to Faith? is a book edited by James K. Hoffmeier and Dennis R. Magary that compiles a series of essays from Christian scholars defending the reliability of the Bible. The book is a response to recent works by Evangelicals that have called into question the historical accuracy of the Bible, and its implications for faith and practice. The essays are divided into four sections: Biblical, Systematic, and Historical Theology; The Old Testament and Issues of History, Authenticity, and Authority; The New Testament and Issues of History, Authenticity, and Authority; and The Old Testament and Archaeology. Contributors to the book include respected scholars such as Allan Millard, Craig Blomberg, Graham Cole, Michael Haykin, Robert Yarbrough, and Darrell Bock.

The importance of historical accuracy in the Bible's storyline

The Bible is a collection of ancient texts that have been compiled over centuries and translated into numerous languages. It is considered the foundational text of the Christian faith and has had a profound impact on Western culture and thought. For many Christians, the Bible is not just a historical document but a living text that speaks to their daily lives and informs their beliefs and actions.

Historical Accuracy and the Bible

The question of whether historical matters matter to faith is a complex and multifaceted one. On the one hand, some scholars and theologians argue that the Bible's primary concern is theological truth, which may be independent of historical accuracy. Progressive evangelicals, for example, have questioned the Bible's historical claims, suggesting that its authority may be limited to matters of faith and practice rather than history or science.

However, others argue that historical accuracy is indeed indispensable to the Bible's storyline and that undermining its historical claims threatens the integrity of Scripture as a whole. This view, known as biblical inerrancy, asserts that the Bible is completely true and trustworthy, including in matters of history.

Defending the Historical Accuracy of the Bible

Several Christian scholars have dedicated their work to defending the historical accuracy of the Bible. One notable example is the book "Do Historical Matters Matter to Faith?" edited by James K. Hoffmeier and Dennis R. Magary. This book is a collection of essays from respected scholars across various disciplines, including theology, archaeology, and philosophy, all lending strong arguments in support of the Bible's historical accuracy.

The contributors to this volume explore how the challenges of history, authenticity, and authority are addressed in both the Old and New Testaments. They also examine how archaeological findings and philosophical arguments further corroborate the Bible's historical reliability. By doing so, they arm Christians with fresh insights, arguments, and language to defend the Bible's historical accuracy in the face of skepticism from certain academic circles.

In conclusion, the importance of historical accuracy in the Bible's storyline is a matter of ongoing debate among theologians and scholars. While some may argue that the Bible's primary concern is theological truth, others insist that historical accuracy is essential to the Bible's authority and reliability. The defense of the Bible's historical accuracy is not just an academic exercise but has practical implications for Christians seeking to live out their faith in a world that often questions and challenges their beliefs.

The legitimacy of Scripture

The book, 'Do Historical Matters Matter to Faith?', edited by James K. Hoffmeier and Dennis R. Magary, is a collection of essays that seek to defend the reliability of the Bible and its historical narratives. The essays are written by scholars from diverse areas of expertise, including theology, archaeology and philosophy, and they explore how the challenges of history, authenticity and authority are answered in the text of the Old and New Testaments.

The contributors to the book argue that historical matters do indeed matter to faith, and that the Bible is trustworthy and true in all that it affirms. They provide fresh insights, arguments and language to defend Scripture's historical accuracy, particularly in response to the claims made by critics such as Kenton Sparks and Peter Enns.

One of the key arguments made by the contributors is that the Bible's historical narratives are trustworthy and correspond to what happened in real-time and place. They also assert that archaeological work continues to contribute to the reliability and truthfulness of the biblical record. Additionally, they emphasise the importance of taking a critical and scholarly approach to the interpretation of Scripture, engaging with the current state of the debate and addressing "thorny issues" concerning the history and evidence for key biblical narratives.

In conclusion, the book 'Do Historical Matters Matter to Faith?' presents a strong defence of Scripture's legitimacy, arguing that historical accuracy is an indispensable part of the Bible's storyline. It provides Christians with the tools and arguments to defend the historical accuracy of the Bible against a culture and academy that may be sceptical of those claims.

The theological implications of modern and postmodern approaches

The book "Do Historical Matters Matter to Faith?: A Critical Appraisal of Modern and Postmodern Approaches to Scripture" edited by James K. Hoffmeier and Dennis R. Magary, explores the theological implications of modern and postmodern approaches to Scripture. The book is a collection of essays from diverse scholars, including theologians, archaeologists, and biblical experts, who defend the historical accuracy and reliability of the Bible against modern and postmodern criticisms.

The book is divided into four main parts: Biblical, Systematic, and Historical Theology; The Old Testament and Issues of History, Authenticity, and Authority; The New Testament and Issues of History, Authenticity, and Authority; and The Old Testament and Archaeology. Each part addresses specific challenges to the historical accuracy of the Bible and provides arguments and evidence to support its reliability.

One of the key theological implications of modern and postmodern approaches is the question of biblical inerrancy. Some progressive evangelicals, such as Peter Enns and Kenton Sparks, have questioned the historical accuracy of the Bible, particularly in relation to Ancient Near Eastern literature, evolution, and science. They argue that the Bible may be inerrant in matters of faith and practice but not necessarily in historical and scientific details. In response, contributors to the book, such as Thomas H. McCall and Richard E. Averbeck, defend the idea of biblical inerrancy by exploring the philosophical assumptions behind higher critical scholarship and refuting consensus views.

Another theological implication of modern and postmodern approaches is the relationship between faith and history. The book addresses whether historical matters are integral to the Bible's storyline or if Scripture is primarily concerned with theological truths. Essays in the collection, such as Robert Yarbrough's "God's Word in Human Words" and Eckhard Schnabel's defense of the Pauline authorship of the Pastoral Epistles, engage with these questions and provide arguments for the historical reliability of specific biblical narratives.

The book also explores the role of archaeology in supporting the Bible's historical accuracy. Steven Ortiz, for example, acknowledges the limitations of archaeology in definitively settling controversial points but argues that archaeological work contributes to the overall reliability and truthfulness of the biblical record.

Overall, the theological implications of modern and postmodern approaches to Scripture are complex and multifaceted. The book "Do Historical Matters Matter to Faith?" provides a robust defense of the Bible's historical accuracy and reliability, addressing specific challenges and providing fresh insights and arguments for Christians seeking to defend the integrity of Scripture.

The defence of Scripture's reliability

The Bible's Divine Inspiration

The Bible is believed to be divinely inspired, meaning that God supernaturally influenced the human authors of Scripture. This does not imply that the Bible is a mere dictation of God's words but rather that the Holy Spirit prompted, guided, and illuminated the writers. The unique personalities and perspectives of the human authors are evident in the various books of the Bible. This collaborative process between the divine and the human ensures the reliability and authority of Scripture.

Inerrancy and Infallibility

As the Bible is believed to be divinely inspired, it is also considered inerrant and infallible. God, being utterly truthful and omniscient, cannot err. The Bible, as God's Word, is thus seen as unswervingly truthful and free from any error, including matters of historical reliability. Anything less than absolute truthfulness would call into question the very character of God.

The Bible's Clarity and Sufficiency

The Bible, being divinely inspired, is also clear and coherent in its message. While it may be challenging to understand at times, any perceived obscurity arises from the reader's limitations and not from the text itself. The Bible is written in the ordinary language of its time, accessible to a wide audience. It provides all that believers need to know to live a life that glorifies God and is, therefore, sufficient for its purpose.

Archaeology and External Evidence

External evidence, including archaeological findings, can also support the reliability of Scripture. While archaeology may not definitively settle all controversial points, it contributes to the overall reliability and truthfulness of the biblical record. For example, archaeological evidence supports the existence of key figures such as King David and Solomon, adding credibility to the historical narratives in the Bible.

The Impact of Progressive Evangelicalism

Progressive evangelicals have questioned the historical accuracy of the Bible, specifically targeting its narratives. This has led to a defence of Scripture's reliability by Christian scholars. They argue that the Bible's historical accuracy is integral to its legitimacy and that modern and postmodern approaches threatening its jurisdiction must be addressed.

In conclusion, the defence of Scripture's reliability rests on several key arguments. The Bible is believed to be divinely inspired, inerrant, clear, and sufficient. External evidence and the defence mounted by Christian scholars against progressive evangelicalism further bolster its reliability.

The role of philosophy and archaeology in corroborating the Bible

The Bible has been under scrutiny from both outside and inside the evangelical faith, with some threatening to reduce its jurisdiction by undermining its historical claims. However, the Bible has been corroborated by both philosophy and archaeology.

Philosophy can be an effective tool for understanding pretheological questions, but it cannot supplant the revelation already made available by God's Scriptures. Biblical philosophy is a dialogue with God, starting from the premise that God exists, whereas philosophy takes up questions concerning the nature of the universe and existence, not necessarily in relation to God. Paul, "the apostle to the Gentiles", is more philosophical than any other writer in the New Testament, as he dealt with the pragmatic issues of polytheism and atheism. Paul was not anti-intellectual and was knowledgeable about Greek philosophy, quoting Greek poets in Acts 17:28 and teaching in the Hall of Tyrannus in Ephesus, a school probably named after a Greek philosopher.

Philosophy has been used to interpret individual experience and human history as they culminate in Christ. For example, the term "Logos" is used by John to interpret the person of Christ in relation to God, man, and the world. This is a development of Philo of Alexandria's interpretation of the Bible through Greek philosophy, mainly with the help of Plato and the Stoics.

Archaeology has also consistently corroborated Biblical accounts. In 1846, an Assyrian obelisk was discovered in what is now northern Iraq, referring to Jehu, a 9th-century BC Hebrew king. This was the first of many archaeological finds that challenged secular claims that the Bible is a collection of made-up myths and folktales. For example, in 1961, an inscription was found bearing the name "Pilate", the earliest known reference to this figure outside of the New Testament. In 1993, a stele mentioning the "House of David" was discovered, placing King David in the historical record.

Historians corroborating the Bible

In addition to archaeological finds, several historians have provided evidence that corroborates the Bible. Mara bar Serapion, a Stoic philosopher from the Roman province of Syria, wrote a letter sometime after 73 AD that refers to the unjust treatment and execution of a "wise king" of the Jews. Many scholars interpret this as an early non-Christian reference to Jesus. Similarly, the Passing of Peregrinus, a satire by Lucian, a Syrian Greek writer, contains one of the earliest evaluations of early Christianity by a non-Christian author. It describes how Christians worship "a man...the distinguished personage who introduced their novel rites, and was crucified on that account".

In conclusion, philosophy and archaeology have both played a role in corroborating the Bible. While philosophy can help to interpret and understand the Bible, archaeology has provided physical evidence that supports its historical accuracy. Additionally, historians have provided written evidence that further corroborates the Bible.

Frequently asked questions