Faith And Credit: Arbitration Awards Examined

Arbitration awards are given full faith and credit, and are analogous to a judgment in a court of law. An arbitration award is a final determination on the jurisdiction, merits, costs or other aspects of a dispute by an arbitration tribunal. The tribunal may order the payment of a sum of money, or it may make a declaration regarding any matter to be determined in the proceedings. In most jurisdictions, the tribunal has the same power as a court to order a party to do or refrain from doing something, to order specific performance of a contract, or to order the rectification, setting aside or cancellation of a deed or other document.

Arbitration awards and their enforceability in international law

Arbitration awards are given full faith and credit in international law, particularly in international trade and commerce. An arbitration award is a final determination on the jurisdiction, merits, costs or other aspects of a dispute by an arbitration tribunal, and is similar to a judgment in a court of law.

The popularity of arbitration as a means of dispute resolution, especially in the commercial sphere, is due to the ease of enforcing awards across borders. The 1958 New York Convention, with 158 signatories, is a key treaty that enables this. The convention rests on two principles: firstly, that a written "agreement to arbitrate" is generally enforceable, and secondly, that an arbitral award may be recognised and enforced as a final judgment in each contracting country.

The New York Convention outlines limited defences that can be used to challenge the recognition and enforcement of an award. These include incapacity of a party to the arbitration agreement, improper notification of proceedings, an award dealing with issues outside the scope of arbitration, the award not being binding, the subject matter not being suitable for arbitration, and enforcement conflicting with public policy.

In the United States, the New York Convention is enshrined in federal law through the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). U.S. courts enforce foreign arbitral awards, with certain safeguards, and are vigilant in cases where a purported foreign award is not genuine.

In India, the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards is governed by the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, which incorporates the New York Convention. However, there have been criticisms of the Indian Judicial System's interpretation of the Act, which has negatively affected the enforceability of foreign awards.

Arbitration awards and their enforceability in domestic law

Arbitration awards are given full faith and credit in the US, as per the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). The FAA is based on the New York Convention of 1958, which has been ratified by 158 countries. The New York Convention allows for the enforcement of arbitration awards in contracting states, subject to certain exceptions.

In the US, to enforce a foreign commercial arbitral award, an award holder need only present an authentic copy of the award to the court. The award will be recognised and enforced unless the losing party can establish a basis for non-recognition under Article V of the New York Convention.

In India, the enforcement of arbitral awards is governed by the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Act makes a distinction between the enforcement of domestic and foreign awards.

For domestic awards, the Act provides that once an award attains finality, the parties may approach the appropriate court for enforcement. The award is then enforced as if it were a decree of the court.

For foreign awards, the Act sets out the conditions under which enforcement may be granted or refused. The courts have the power to refuse enforcement but not to set aside the award. The opposing party has no recourse against the award other than seeking its non-enforcement.

In both the US and India, the courts are sensitive to cases where a purported foreign "award" was not genuine and will refuse enforcement where serious questions exist.

The process of challenging an arbitration award

An arbitration award is a final determination on the jurisdiction, merits, costs, or other aspects of a dispute by an arbitration tribunal in an arbitration. It is similar to a judgment in a court of law.

Challenging an arbitration award can be done under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) (9 U.S.C. § 10). However, a court's ability to vacate an arbitration award under the FAA is limited to avoid undermining the purpose of arbitration as an alternative to litigation. The process of challenging an arbitration award typically involves the following steps:

• Grounds for Challenge: The challenging party must establish valid grounds for challenging the award. Common grounds include corruption, fraud, impartiality, or misconduct by the arbitrators, or the arbitrators exceeding their powers.
• Timely Filing: A party typically has a limited time frame, such as three months, to file a motion to vacate the award in a federal district court after the award is filed or delivered.
• Jurisdiction: The motion to vacate should be filed in the district where the original arbitration award was made, unless otherwise specified in the arbitration agreement.
• Notice and Hearing: The challenging party must provide notice to all relevant parties and may request a hearing to present their arguments and evidence supporting the challenge.
• Evidence and Arguments: The challenging party must present compelling evidence and legal arguments to support their claim that the arbitration award should be vacated or modified.
• Court Decision: The court will review the evidence and arguments presented and make a decision. The court may uphold, vacate, or modify the arbitration award based on the merits of the challenge and applicable laws.
• Appeal: If the challenging party is not satisfied with the court's decision, they may have the option to appeal the decision to a higher court, depending on the specific circumstances and legal jurisdiction.

It is important to note that the process of challenging an arbitration award may vary slightly depending on the jurisdiction and the specific laws or regulations in place. Additionally, arbitration awards are generally given full faith and credit, meaning they are enforced as if they were final judgments of a court of general jurisdiction.

The role of the tribunal in arbitration awards

An arbitration award is a final determination on the jurisdiction, merits, costs, or other aspects of a dispute by an arbitration tribunal. It is similar to a judgment in a court of law and is enforceable in many countries. The tribunal's role in arbitration awards is to issue a binding decision that resolves the dispute between the parties. This decision can include a range of remedies, such as ordering the payment of money (damages), making declarations, or ordering specific actions to be taken or refrained from.

The tribunal's role in the arbitration process is crucial, and it has a wide range of powers to ensure a fair and efficient process. The tribunal is responsible for issuing directions and orders that regulate the conduct of the arbitration. While these are not considered "awards," they can have a significant impact on the outcome of the case. The tribunal also has the power to issue interim or partial awards, which resolve one or more issues in dispute but not all of them, allowing for a more flexible and efficient process.

In addition, the tribunal plays a key role in ensuring the enforceability of the award. This includes scrutinising the award to ensure it meets the necessary requirements, such as being in writing, signed by the arbitrators, and stating the reasons for the decision. The tribunal also needs to ensure that it has jurisdiction and has properly understood the issues to avoid challenges to the award.

Furthermore, the tribunal has a duty to exercise independent judgment and not delegate its decision-making function to assistants or secretaries. While these individuals can provide support and perform administrative tasks, the ultimate responsibility for the decision rests with the tribunal members.

Overall, the tribunal's role in arbitration awards is to ensure a fair, efficient, and binding resolution of disputes, with a focus on maintaining the integrity of the process and the enforceability of the award.

The types of arbitration awards

An arbitration award (or arbitral award) is a final determination on the jurisdiction, merits, costs or other aspects of a dispute by an arbitration tribunal. It is considered analogous to a judgment in a court of law. While a successful party in arbitration will usually be awarded compensation or damages, tribunals typically have a range of remedies that can form part of the award.

• Provisional Award: This is an award made on a provisional basis, subject to the final determination of the merits. It provides a temporary solution until a final decision can be reached.
• Partial Award: A partial award addresses only a part of the claims or cross-claims presented, or it may determine specific issues between the parties. This type of award allows the parties to either resolve or continue arbitrating or litigating the remaining issues.
• Agreed Award: This is usually in the form of a settlement between the parties, similar to a judgment by consent. Embodying the settlement as an award can offer several advantages.
• Reasoned Award: While not a sub-category, a reasoned award is one in which the tribunal explains its reasoning for its decision. This provides transparency and insight into the factors considered by the tribunal.
• Additional Award: An additional award is made by the tribunal, either on its own initiative or upon the application of a party, regarding any claim that was presented but not addressed in the principal award.
• Draft Award: A draft award is not binding on the parties until it is confirmed by the tribunal. It serves as a proposed decision that can be reviewed and modified before becoming final.

It is important to note that the specific requirements for arbitration awards may vary from country to country and can also depend on the terms of the arbitration agreement. In most cases, awards can be oral, but they are usually delivered in writing to ensure a clear and permanent record of the decision.

Frequently asked questions